Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Vaccinations

Vaccinations

Cancer Vaccines

Cancer Vaccines

Cancer treatment vaccines are a rapidly evolving field that offers a promising approach to immunotherapy. Unlike traditional vaccines that prevent diseases, cancer treatment vaccines are designed to treat existing cancers by stimulating the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells.
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Are the knowledge, tools and resources to control foot and mouth disease available?

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2024

Same author

Application of Global Burden of Animal Diseases methods at country level: experiences of the Ethiopia case study.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2024

Same author

Selection and use of reference panels: a case study highlighting current gaps in the materials available for foot and mouth disease.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2021

Same author

Estimating the protection afforded by foot-and-mouth disease vaccines in the laboratory.

Vaccine·2019

Same author

Quantifying Levels of Peste Des Petits Ruminants (PPR) Virus in Excretions from Experimentally Infected Goats and Its Importance for Nascent PPR Eradication Programme.

Viruses·2019

Same author

Assessing the variability in transmission of bovine tuberculosis within Spanish cattle herds.

Epidemics·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

In Vitro ELISA Test to Evaluate Rabies Vaccine Potency

In Vitro ELISA Test to Evaluate Rabies Vaccine Potency

Published on: May 11, 2020

Veterinary and human vaccine evaluation methods.

T J D Knight-Jones¹, K Edmond, S Gubbins

¹The Pirbright Institute, , Pirbright, UK, The Royal Veterinary College (VEEPH), University of London, , London, UK, School of Paediatrics and Child Health (SPACH), The University of Western Australia, , Crawley, Australia.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences

|April 18, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Human and veterinary vaccine evaluation methods differ significantly. This review highlights discrepancies in assessing vaccine efficacy and effectiveness, advocating for standardized terminology and rigorous evaluation in veterinary medicine.

Keywords:

evaluation vaccine vaccine effectiveness veterinary

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

Expression and Purification of Virus-like Particles for Vaccination

Expression and Purification of Virus-like Particles for Vaccination

Published on: June 2, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

In Vitro ELISA Test to Evaluate Rabies Vaccine Potency

In Vitro ELISA Test to Evaluate Rabies Vaccine Potency

Published on: May 11, 2020

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

Expression and Purification of Virus-like Particles for Vaccination

Expression and Purification of Virus-like Particles for Vaccination

Published on: June 2, 2016

Area of Science:

Veterinary Medicine
Immunology
Vaccinology

Background:

Human and veterinary vaccine evaluation methodologies present marked differences.
Key terms like vaccine efficacy and effectiveness are applied inconsistently across human and veterinary fields.
Current veterinary vaccine assessment often relies on challenge and sero-conversion studies, unlike human vaccines evaluated in trials or observational studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To review and compare human and veterinary vaccine evaluation approaches.
To identify limitations in current veterinary vaccine assessment methods.
To recommend improvements for veterinary vaccine evaluation.

Main Methods:

Comparative review of human and veterinary vaccine evaluation strategies.
Analysis of terminology used in vaccine efficacy and effectiveness assessment.
Case illustration using Foot-and-mouth disease vaccine evaluation.

Main Results:

Human vaccine evaluation emphasizes efficacy (ideal conditions) and effectiveness (routine conditions).
Veterinary vaccine evaluation uses a broader definition of efficacy and often employs challenge studies, which may not reflect field conditions.
Field studies for vaccine effectiveness are crucial but often limited in veterinary settings due to lack of central coordination.

Conclusions:

Standardization of terminology in veterinary vaccine evaluation is necessary.
Rigorous evaluation methods, including field studies, are essential for veterinary vaccines.
Adopting more consistent and robust evaluation frameworks will improve veterinary vaccine performance assessment.