Multiple pathways are involved in DNA degradation during keratinocyte terminal differentiation

M Yamamoto-Tanaka1, T Makino2, A Motoyama3

  • 11] Shiseido Research Center, 2-2-1 Hayabuchi, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama 224-8558, Japan [2] Department of Dermatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.

Cell Death & Disease
|April 19, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Two pathways involving epidermal mesotrypsin and caspase-14 contribute to nuclear degradation during keratinocyte differentiation. These processes are crucial for skin health and are impaired in conditions like atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Dermatology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Nuclear loss is essential for keratinocyte terminal differentiation.
  • Key events include profilaggrin N-terminal fragment (FLG-N) nuclear translocation and caspase-14-dependent inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase (ICAD) degradation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms of nuclear degradation during keratinocyte terminal differentiation.
  • To identify the roles of epidermal mesotrypsin and caspase-14 in this process.

Main Methods:

  • Demonstration of FLG-N liberation and nuclear translocation by epidermal mesotrypsin.
  • Analysis of caspase-14's role in ICAD proteolysis and subsequent caspase-activated DNase (CAD) activity.
  • Utilizing a skin equivalent model with protease knockdown and immunohistochemistry on patient skin samples.

Main Results:

  • Epidermal mesotrypsin liberates FLG-N, leading to nuclear translocation and TUNEL positivity.
  • Caspase-14 degrades ICAD, releasing CAD into TUNEL-positive nuclei.
  • Knockdown of these proteases increases remnant nuclei; both proteases are downregulated in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis skin lesions.

Conclusions:

  • At least two distinct pathways, involving epidermal mesotrypsin and caspase-14, mediate DNA degradation during keratinocyte terminal differentiation.
  • Dysregulation of these pathways may contribute to the pathogenesis of skin disorders characterized by impaired differentiation.

Related Concept Videos

Nucleotide Excision Repair01:38

Nucleotide Excision Repair

DNA Distortion and Damage
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
4.6K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Overview
33.7K
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
28.9K
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

7.5K
The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway01:31

The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway

Internal cellular stress, such as cellular injury or hypoxia, triggers intrinsic apoptosis. The B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family of proteins are the primary regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. For example, during DNA damage, checkpoint proteins, such as Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM protein) and Checkpoints Factor-2 (Chk2) proteins, are activated. These proteins phosphorylate p53 which further activates pro-apoptotic proteins, such as Bax, Bak, PUMA, and Noxa, and inhibits...
6.2K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
6.3K