Assessing recovery and disability after physical trauma: the Pediatric Injury Functional Outcome Scale

Linda Ewing-Cobbs1, Douglas R Bloom2, Mary R Prasad2

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonDepartment of Pediatrics, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston linda.ewing-cobbs@uth.tmc.edu.

Insights

The Pediatric Injury Functional Outcome Scale (PIFOS) reliably measures recovery after traumatic brain or orthopedic injuries in children. This scale is valuable for tracking progress in research and clinical settings.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Traumatology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Child Psychology

Background:

  • Assessing functional recovery in children post-injury is crucial for effective rehabilitation.
  • Existing tools may not adequately capture the multifaceted nature of pediatric injury outcomes.
  • A brief, reliable, and valid scale is needed to evaluate recovery across various domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish the reliability and validity of the Pediatric Injury Functional Outcome Scale (PIFOS).
  • To assess the scale's utility in capturing functional outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and orthopedic injury (OI).

Main Methods:

  • A prospective longitudinal study involving parents of children aged 3-15 years.
  • The PIFOS structured interview was administered at 3 and 12 months post-hospitalization for TBI or OI.
  • Statistical analyses, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and generalized linear modeling, were performed.

Main Results:

  • The PIFOS demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .90-.93) and inter-rater reliability (α = .90).
  • The scale showed significant correlations with injury severity and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
  • PIFOS was sensitive to injury type/severity and responsive to changes within the first year post-injury, identifying specific difficulties in both TBI and OI groups.

Conclusions:

  • The PIFOS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing functional outcomes in children after TBI and OI.
  • The scale is useful for evaluating recovery in both natural history and intervention studies.
  • Findings highlight persistent challenges in coordination, emotionality, social participation, and discomfort in pediatric injury survivors.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos