Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
Philadelphia chromosome-positive mixed phenotype acute leukemia in the imatinib era
Hiroaki Shimizu1, Akihiko Yokohama, Nahoko Hatsumi
1Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan.
Although the introduction of imatinib dramatically improved the outcomes for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + BCP-ALL), the survival benefit of imatinib has not been assessed in the context of Ph + mixed phenotype acute leukemia (Ph + MPAL). To clarify this important issue, we studied 42 Ph+ acute leukemia (Ph + AL) patients who received intensive chemotherapy and concurrent administration of imatinib. Of the 42 Ph + AL patients, 13 (31%) patients were categorized as Ph + MPAL (positive for both myeloid and B-cell lineage), 27 (64%) were categorized as Ph + BCP-ALL, and two (5%) were categorized as Ph + acute myeloid leukemia. The complete remission rates after the initial induction therapy were not significantly different when comparing Ph + MPAL and Ph + BCP-ALL patients (100% vs. 85%, respectively, P = 0.14). Likewise, there were no significant differences in the 5-yr overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) rates when comparing the MPAL and BCP-ALL groups (OS: 55% vs. 53%, respectively, P = 0.87, DFS: 46% vs. 42%, respectively, P = 0.94). These findings suggest that concurrent imatinib administration with chemotherapy improved the outcomes of Ph + MPAL patients to the level seen in Ph+BCP-ALL patients and should, therefore, be considered as the standard therapy for these patients.
Although the introduction of imatinib dramatically improved the outcomes for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + BCP-ALL), the survival benefit of imatinib has not been assessed in the context of Ph + mixed phenotype acute leukemia (Ph + MPAL). To clarify this important issue, we studied 42 Ph+ acute leukemia (Ph + AL) patients who received intensive chemotherapy and concurrent administration of imatinib. Of the 42 Ph + AL patients, 13 (31%) patients were categorized as Ph + MPAL (positive for both myeloid and B-cell lineage), 27 (64%) were categorized as Ph + BCP-ALL, and two (5%) were categorized as Ph + acute myeloid leukemia. The complete remission rates after the initial induction therapy were not significantly different when comparing Ph + MPAL and Ph + BCP-ALL patients (100% vs. 85%, respectively, P = 0.14). Likewise, there were no significant differences in the 5-yr overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) rates when comparing the MPAL and BCP-ALL groups (OS: 55% vs. 53%, respectively, P = 0.87, DFS: 46% vs. 42%, respectively, P = 0.94). These findings suggest that concurrent imatinib administration with chemotherapy improved the outcomes of Ph + MPAL patients to the level seen in Ph+BCP-ALL patients and should, therefore, be considered as the standard therapy for these patients.
More Related Videos
09:02Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
04:36Comet Assay to Quantify DNA Damage in FLT3 Mutant-expressing 32D Cells after Exposure to Type I and Type II FLT3 Inhibitors
Published on: October 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...