Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K
Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

716
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
716
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.9K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.9K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

482
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
482
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Appearance Preoccupation and Safety Behaviors in Body Dysmorphic Disorder: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Behavior therapy·2026
Same author

Simulations in statistical workflows.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same author

Adapting tree-based multiple imputation methods for multilevel data? A simulation study.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

How often is "often"? Improving assessment of the externalizing spectrum using absolute frequency.

Psychological assessment·2025
Same author

Associations Among in-The-Moment Emotional Clarity, Emotion Regulation, and Psychopathology in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Depression and anxiety·2025
Same author

Bayesian Thurstonian IRT Modeling: Logical Dependencies as an Accurate Reflection of Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.

Paul-Christian Bürkner1, Philipp Doebler

  • 1Psychology and Sport Sciences, Fliednerstr. 21, D-48149, Münster, Germany.

Statistics in Medicine
|April 23, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The trim and fill method combined with the logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio (ln ω) is recommended for detecting publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis. This approach demonstrates reliable performance, even in challenging scenarios with sufficient study numbers.

Keywords:
diagnostic meta-analysisdiagnostic odds ratiopublication biassimulation studytrim and fill

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Diagnostic Test Evaluation

Background:

  • Publication bias poses a significant threat to the validity of diagnostic meta-analyses.
  • Previous research on detecting publication bias has primarily focused on specific univariate measures, limiting broader applicability.
  • The choice of statistical models for pooling data versus detecting bias in diagnostic meta-analysis requires careful consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of various statistical tests for detecting publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis through simulation.
  • To compare the effectiveness of different univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy when combined with bias detection tests.
  • To identify the most reliable method for detecting publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation study to assess statistical tests for publication bias detection.
  • Evaluation of type I error rates and statistical power under diverse conditions.
  • Comparison of linear regression, rank correlation, and trim and fill methods combined with univariate diagnostic accuracy measures, including the logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio (ln ω).

Main Results:

  • Tests based on linear regression or rank correlation are not recommended due to inflated type I error rates or low statistical power.
  • The combination of the trim and fill method with ln ω exhibited non-inflated or only slightly inflated type I error rates.
  • Trim and fill with ln ω demonstrated medium to high statistical power, particularly when the number of studies in the meta-analysis was sufficiently large.

Conclusions:

  • The trim and fill method combined with ln ω is the recommended approach for detecting funnel plot asymmetry in diagnostic meta-analysis.
  • This recommended method offers robust performance, even under extreme simulation conditions, provided an adequate number of studies are included.
  • The findings offer practical guidance for improving the reliability of diagnostic meta-analyses by effectively addressing publication bias.