Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

10:29
A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
Published on: May 8, 2021
3.8K
Living among the affluent: boon or bane?
Louis Tay1, Mike Morrison2, Ed Diener3
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University stay@purdue.edu.
Psychological Science
|April 24, 2014
Summary
National income impacts happiness, but not always positively. While richer nations boost life satisfaction, they also increase negative daily emotions like worry and anger, affecting overall subjective well-being.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Economics
- Cross-cultural Psychology
Background:
- Personal income is a known predictor of subjective well-being (SWB).
- The influence of national income on individual SWB, beyond personal income, remains less understood.
- Cross-cultural variations in the relationship between income and happiness warrant investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if national income influences subjective well-being (SWB) independently of personal income.
- To explore how national income affects different facets of SWB, including life satisfaction and daily emotional experiences.
- To examine moderating factors, such as national wealth and residential mobility, in the income-SWB relationship.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional multilevel analysis was employed.
- Data from 838,151 individuals across 158 nations were analyzed.
- Statistical models controlled for personal income to isolate the effects of national income.
Main Results:
- Higher personal income consistently correlated with increased SWB.
- National income positively impacted life satisfaction but negatively affected daily emotional well-being (increased worry and anger).
- The positive association between personal income and SWB was stronger in wealthier nations, potentially due to cultural norms valuing money.
Conclusions:
- National income exerts a complex influence on individual happiness, with both positive and negative consequences.
- The wealth of a nation affects life satisfaction and daily emotional states, highlighting the importance of macro-level economic factors.
- Individual SWB is moderated by national economic context and personal characteristics like residential mobility.
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
28.5K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
28.5K
Cognitive Dissonance
29.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
29.1K
Social Traps
20.5K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
20.5K
Groupthink
37.0K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
37.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
17.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
17.9K
