Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

11.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
11.9K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

6.0K
6.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.1K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.1K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.1K
1.1K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

10.6K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
10.6K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

7.3K
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconnecting Minds to the World: Patient Perspectives on Brain-Computer Interface After High Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Annals of rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same author

Is Richard Baxter's Melancholia Still Relevant Today?: Comparative Network Structures of Depressive Symptoms in Asian Individuals With Guilt-Rich and Guilt-Free Depression.

Psychiatry investigation·2026
Same author

Human RNA polymerase III termination favors decomposition over facilitated recycling.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Comparative Network Structures of Hikikomori (Social Withdrawal) Symptoms in Korean and Japanese Psychiatric Patients Prescribed Antidepressants: Findings From the Research on Asian Psychotropic Patterns for Antidepressants, Phase 3.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

Universal conditional knockout approach to multiple species, from fish to human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Analysis of unmapped RNA-seq data from cancer spatial transcriptome toward characterizing cancer microbiome.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

16.2K

Protein conformational dynamics dictate the binding affinity for a ligand.

Moon-Hyeong Seo1, Jeongbin Park2, Eunkyung Kim1

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Korea.

Nature Communications
|April 25, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how the shape changes in a protein affect its ability to bind and release a molecule called a ligand. Using a specific protein that binds maltose, the researchers created different versions of the protein that change shape at different speeds. They found that the faster a protein opens up, the more quickly it releases the ligand. This suggests that the natural movement of a protein plays a key role in how tightly it holds onto a ligand. The findings help clarify how proteins interact with other molecules and could inform future research on drug binding and protein function.

Keywords:
Protein-ligand interactionsSingle-molecule analysisMaltose-binding proteinConformational flexibility

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
13:26

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Published on: September 13, 2014

63.3K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

16.2K
Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
13:26

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Published on: September 13, 2014

63.3K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Protein-ligand interaction studies in molecular biology
  • Single-molecule biophysics in structural biology
  • Kinetic analysis within biochemical research

Background:

Ligand binding to proteins is a central process in biology, but the mechanisms governing binding affinity remain partially understood. Prior research has shown that binding and dissociation are key steps in ligand-protein interactions. However, the role of protein conformational dynamics in these steps is still debated. Some studies suggest that protein flexibility may influence binding, but direct evidence is limited. No prior work had resolved how intrinsic protein dynamics affect dissociation rates specifically. That uncertainty drove this investigation into maltose-binding protein mutants. These mutants offer a controlled system to test the influence of conformational changes. This gap motivated the use of single-molecule kinetic analysis to observe binding dynamics. The goal was to determine whether protein motion directly affects ligand dissociation.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between protein conformational dynamics and ligand dissociation. The specific problem was to determine whether intrinsic protein motion influences binding affinity. The motivation came from the need to clarify how protein flexibility affects ligand interactions. The researchers proposed to use maltose-binding protein mutants with known conformational differences. These mutants allowed for a direct comparison of binding behavior. The study focused on dissociation rates as a key indicator of binding affinity. The authors sought to provide experimental evidence for the role of protein dynamics in ligand release. This approach offered a novel way to test long-standing hypotheses about protein-ligand interactions.

Main Methods:

The researchers used single-molecule kinetic analysis to study protein-ligand interactions. They selected maltose-binding protein mutants with distinct conformational dynamics. Each mutant had a different intrinsic opening rate and dissociation constant for maltose. The experimental setup allowed for real-time observation of ligand binding and release. The analysis focused on measuring dissociation rates under controlled conditions. The authors compared the results across mutants to identify patterns. They used kinetic modeling to correlate conformational changes with binding behavior. This approach enabled direct observation of how protein motion affects ligand dissociation.

Main Results:

The strongest finding was that ligand dissociation rates correlated with protein opening rates. Mutants with faster intrinsic opening rates showed higher dissociation rates for maltose. This correlation provided direct evidence that protein dynamics influence ligand release. The results showed a clear relationship between conformational flexibility and binding affinity. The dissociation constants varied significantly across the mutant series. The fastest-opening mutant had the highest dissociation rate. The slowest-opening mutant exhibited the lowest dissociation rate. These data supported the hypothesis that protein motion directly affects ligand binding and release.

Conclusions:

The authors concluded that intrinsic protein conformational dynamics determine ligand dissociation rates. Their findings suggest that protein motion is a key factor in binding affinity. The study demonstrated that faster opening rates lead to faster ligand release. The results support the idea that protein flexibility influences binding behavior. The authors proposed that conformational dynamics are essential for ligand interactions. This conclusion is based on the observed correlation between opening rates and dissociation constants. The study provides experimental evidence for a previously hypothesized mechanism. These findings may have implications for understanding protein-ligand interactions in biological systems.

The researchers found that faster intrinsic opening rates of the protein correlate with higher ligand dissociation rates, suggesting that conformational flexibility directly affects binding affinity.

The mutants allowed the researchers to test the effect of different conformational dynamics on ligand binding and dissociation in a controlled system.

They used single-molecule kinetic analysis to observe and quantify the dissociation of maltose from the protein mutants in real time.

The intrinsic opening rate determines the speed of ligand dissociation, as shown by the correlation between mutant opening rates and observed dissociation constants.

The dissociation constant reflects binding affinity, and its variation across mutants confirmed the influence of protein dynamics on ligand interactions.

The authors propose that conformational dynamics are a key determinant of binding affinity, offering new insights into the mechanisms of ligand binding in biological systems.