Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Population Growth

Population Growth

Population size is dynamic, increasing with birth rates and immigration, and decreasing with death rates and emigration. In ideal conditions with unlimited resources, populations can increase exponentially, which plots as a J-shaped growth rate curve of population size against time. This type of curve is characteristic of newly-introduced invasive species, or populations that have suffered catastrophic declines and are rebounding.

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...

Modeling with Differential Equations

Modeling with Differential Equations

Population dynamics can be described mathematically by considering the population size P(t) as a function of time. The rate of change of the population is then represented by the derivative of P(t). A simple assumption is that the rate of growth is proportional to the size of the population itself. This leads to an exponential growth model, where the population increases rapidly without bound. While this is a useful first approximation, it does not reflect realistic long-term...

Genetic Drift

Genetic Drift

Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

5E management protocol for enhanced recovery after total knee arthroplasty: stratified RCT.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research·2026

Same author

Large language models instantiate evolutionarily robust strategies of cooperation.

PNAS nexus·2026

Same author

Ocean acidification exacerbates UVR-induced inhibition of photosystem II and I in Corallina officinalis.

Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology·2026

Same author

Bivalent impact of social networks on overarming: Insights on the alignment between social and individual interests.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Direct Photocatalytic Conversion of Methane to Acetone Through a Synergistic Ta Single-Atom/Ga Lewis Acid Catalyst.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026

Same author

Opioid Receptor Independent Effects of Opioid Peptides.

Current reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology·2026

Same journal

Development of whole-limb skeletal patterning through the coordination of growth and self-organization models.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

The energetic cost of human standing balance and gait initiation over a range of natural postures.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Combinatorial multiomic analysis from a pedigree of Sox10Dom Hirschsprung mice identifies multiple high confidence candidate modifiers of Enteric Nervous System development.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Extracting host-specific developmental signatures from longitudinal microbiome data.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Population sparseness determines strength of Hebbian plasticity for maximal memory lifetime in associative networks.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Predictive coding explains asymmetric connectivity in the brain: A neural network study.

PLoS computational biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Evolutionary game dynamics in populations with heterogenous structures.

Wes Maciejewski¹, Feng Fu², Christoph Hauert¹

¹Department of Mathematics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Plos Computational Biology

|April 26, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The way payoffs are calculated and interaction rates affect evolutionary game dynamics. Heterogeneous graphs may not always favor cooperation, and new measures are needed for evolutionary advantage in these structures.

More Related Videos

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Published on: July 4, 2007

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Published on: July 4, 2007

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

Area of Science:

Evolutionary game theory
Social behavior modeling
Population dynamics

Background:

Evolutionary graph theory models social behavior in structured populations.
Heterogeneous graphs (varying connections) are often thought to promote cooperation.
Previous models may overlook crucial interaction details.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how individual-level interaction rules affect cooperation in heterogeneous graphs.
To determine the impact of payoff calculation (averaging vs. accumulating) on cooperation.
To re-evaluate measures of evolutionary advantage in heterogeneous populations.

Main Methods:

Simulations of evolutionary game dynamics on homogeneous and heterogeneous graphs.
Analysis of payoff accumulation versus averaging methods.
Derivation of new fixation probability measures for heterogeneous populations.

Main Results:

Averaging payoffs, rather than accumulating them, can eliminate the cooperative advantage of heterogeneous graphs.
The rate of game interactions significantly influences the cooperation levels supported by different graph structures.
Standard measures of evolutionary advantage are biased in heterogeneous populations due to mutation site bias.

Conclusions:

The cooperative advantage of heterogeneous graphs is contingent on specific interaction rules and payoff calculations.
New, bias-corrected measures are required to accurately assess evolutionary advantage in heterogeneous populations.
Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately modeling the evolution of cooperation.