Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

742
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
742
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

651
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
651
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.4K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

712
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
712
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.6K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.6K
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

1.0K
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harnessing multi-output machine learning approach and dynamical observables from network structure to optimize COVID-19 intervention strategies.

Biology methods & protocols·2025
Same author

Correction: Complex networks applied to political analysis: Group voting behavior in the Brazilian congress.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Additive effect of wildfires on hospital admission in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Complex networks applied to political analysis: Group voting behavior in the Brazilian congress.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Interrelating neuronal morphology by coincidence similarity networks.

Journal of theoretical biology·2025
Same author

Comparing random walks in graph embedding and link prediction.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Invaders taking over-Mollusc faunal change in volcanic barrier lakes of the Albertine Rift biodiversity hotspot.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

AI-driven molecular diversification and ligand-based optimization of macitentan derivatives targeting VEGFR1 and endothelin signaling pathways.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Performance patterns and records in the world aquatics masters championships: Where do the most frequently represented nations among the top-ten masters swimmers come from?

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Modeling diurnal Temperature-Rainfall relationships under multicollinearity using PLS-SEM: A case study of Ghana.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Organizational culture, social capital, and emergency capacity in primary healthcare institutions: A cross-sectional structural equation modeling study comparing ordinary and older communities.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Impact of kidney function on the metabolome in the general population.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.0K

A systematic comparison of supervised classifiers.

Diego Raphael Amancio1, Cesar Henrique Comin2, Dalcimar Casanova2

  • 1Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Plos One
|April 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right machine learning classifier and parameters is crucial for accurate pattern recognition. Default settings often work well, but tuning parameters, especially for Support Vector Machines (SVM), can significantly boost accuracy.

More Related Videos

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

21.0K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.0K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

21.0K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Pattern Recognition

Background:

  • Pattern recognition is widely used across industries and academia.
  • No single pattern recognition technique excels in all applications.
  • Selecting appropriate classifiers and parameters is challenging for non-experts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of nine common classifiers in the Weka framework.
  • To investigate the impact of parameter configurations on classification accuracy.
  • To provide guidance for practical classification tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Performance study of nine well-known classifiers.
  • Comparison of classification accuracy across different parameter settings.
  • Utilized the Weka machine learning framework.

Main Results:

  • Default Weka parameters offer near-optimal performance for most classifiers.
  • Support Vector Machines (SVM) performance can be significantly improved by parameter tuning.
  • K-nearest neighbor (KNN) frequently achieved the highest accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Parameter optimization is essential for maximizing classifier performance, particularly for SVM.
  • Default settings are a good starting point, but not always sufficient.
  • KNN is a strong contender for high-accuracy pattern recognition tasks.