Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Mouse Naïve CD4+ T Cell Isolation and In vitro Differentiation into T Cell Subsets
Published on: April 16, 2015
Cognate interactions between helper T cells and B cells. II. Dissection of cognate help by using a class
W C Bartlett1, A Michael, J McCann
1Department of Microbiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03756.
In order to determine the involvement of T-B cell contact vs lymphokine production in mediating B cell cycle entry and progression, Th cell clones "defective" in lymphokine production were cloned. Th-3.1 is one such clone that required IL-2 to produce significant levels of IL-4 and IFN-gamma. Unlike conventional Th clones, Th-3.1 induced B cell proliferation only in the presence of Ag and IL-2. In contrast to the absolute requirement of IL-2 for Th-3.1-induced B cell proliferation, IL-2 was not required for the formation of stable Th-3.1-B cell conjugates or Th-3.1-induced B cell entry into the G1 phase of the cell cycle. In the absence of IL-2 and under conditions that promoted Th-B cell interactions, Th-3.1 induced 10 to 20% of resting B cells to enter G1. B cell entry into the cell cycle was not inhibited by anti-lymphokine mAb or promoted by exogenous lymphokines, suggesting that endogenous lymphokine activity was not required for Th-3.1-induced G0 to G1 transition. The data suggested that the IL-2-independent induction of B cells into G1 by Th-3.1 was a cell contact-dependent event. Direct proof that Th-3.1-B cell contact was necessary for B cell cycle entry was provided by comparative in situ analysis of the RNA synthetic activity and the RNA content of B cells that were in physical contact with Th-3.1 or not in contact with Th-3.1. In situ autoradiography of RNA synthesis illustrated that a high frequency of B cells in contact with Th-3.1 expressed heightened RNA synthetic activity, whereas "bystander" B cells were less frequently induced into cycle. In situ laser cytometry of B cell size and total RNA content showed that B cells in physical contact with Th-3.1 had a higher RNA content and were larger than "bystander" B cells present in the same microcultures. This model system has allowed the dissection of T cell help into IL-2-dependent and IL-2-independent phases. Early cell contact-dependent events and B cell cycle progression into G1 were IL-2 independent, whereas the production of lymphokines (IL-4, IFN-gamma) by Th-3.1 and Th-3.1-induced B cell proliferation was IL-2 dependent.
In order to determine the involvement of T-B cell contact vs lymphokine production in mediating B cell cycle entry and progression, Th cell clones "defective" in lymphokine production were cloned. Th-3.1 is one such clone that required IL-2 to produce significant levels of IL-4 and IFN-gamma. Unlike conventional Th clones, Th-3.1 induced B cell proliferation only in the presence of Ag and IL-2. In contrast to the absolute requirement of IL-2 for Th-3.1-induced B cell proliferation, IL-2 was not required for the formation of stable Th-3.1-B cell conjugates or Th-3.1-induced B cell entry into the G1 phase of the cell cycle. In the absence of IL-2 and under conditions that promoted Th-B cell interactions, Th-3.1 induced 10 to 20% of resting B cells to enter G1. B cell entry into the cell cycle was not inhibited by anti-lymphokine mAb or promoted by exogenous lymphokines, suggesting that endogenous lymphokine activity was not required for Th-3.1-induced G0 to G1 transition. The data suggested that the IL-2-independent induction of B cells into G1 by Th-3.1 was a cell contact-dependent event. Direct proof that Th-3.1-B cell contact was necessary for B cell cycle entry was provided by comparative in situ analysis of the RNA synthetic activity and the RNA content of B cells that were in physical contact with Th-3.1 or not in contact with Th-3.1. In situ autoradiography of RNA synthesis illustrated that a high frequency of B cells in contact with Th-3.1 expressed heightened RNA synthetic activity, whereas "bystander" B cells were less frequently induced into cycle. In situ laser cytometry of B cell size and total RNA content showed that B cells in physical contact with Th-3.1 had a higher RNA content and were larger than "bystander" B cells present in the same microcultures. This model system has allowed the dissection of T cell help into IL-2-dependent and IL-2-independent phases. Early cell contact-dependent events and B cell cycle progression into G1 were IL-2 independent, whereas the production of lymphokines (IL-4, IFN-gamma) by Th-3.1 and Th-3.1-induced B cell proliferation was IL-2 dependent.
More Related Videos
11:50Retroviral Transduction of Helper T Cells as a Genetic Approach to Study Mechanisms Controlling their Differentiation and Function
Published on: November 4, 2016
07:07Evaluation of T Follicular Helper Cells and Germinal Center Response During Influenza A Virus Infection in Mice
Published on: June 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Special Features of Adaptive Immunity
The primary cell types involved in adaptive immunity are T cells and B cells. Each type has a unique role in defending the body against pathogens. T cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity. They identify and eliminate infected cells directly,...
Cells of the Adaptive Immune Response
Antigens Involved in Adaptive Immunity
Complete Antigens
Complete antigens possess both immunogenicity and reactivity.
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
B Cell Activation and Differentiation
When naive B cells encounter a specific antigen that can bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) on their surface, they undergo sensitization to respond to the antigen's presence. Sensitization begins with...