Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Retinal Pigment Epithelium Transplantation in a Non-human Primate Model for Degenerative Retinal Diseases
Published on: June 14, 2021
Clinical-pathologic correlation: vitrectomy with epiretinal and internal limiting membrane peel.
Clinical and pathologic findings in epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peels often differ. Combined ERM-ILM specimens are common, suggesting these membranes are not always distinct during surgery.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Surgery
- Surgical Pathology
Background:
- Epiretinal membranes (ERM) and internal limiting membranes (ILM) are often targeted in vitreoretinal surgery.
- Accurate intraoperative differentiation of these membranes can be challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To correlate clinical diagnoses with pathologic findings for ERM and ILM peels.
- To assess the frequency of combined ERM-ILM specimens.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 698 vitrectomy specimens from 2008-2012.
- Analysis of clinical and pathology reports for ERM and/or ILM peels.
Main Results:
- Discrepancies between operative and pathologic diagnoses occurred in over 43% of cases.
- Combined ERM-ILM diagnoses were dominant both clinically and pathologically.
- Pathology revealed incongruous specimens in a significant percentage of cases labeled as ERM, ILM, or ERM-ILM.
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative distinction between ERM and ILM can be difficult.
- Combined ERM-ILM specimens may be more prevalent than previously thought.
- The findings suggest ERM and ILM are not always surgically separable.
More Related Videos
10:14Author Spotlight: Ex Vivo OCT-Based Multimodal Imaging of Human Donor Eyes for Research into Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Published on: May 26, 2023
10:00Techniques for Processing Eyes Implanted with a Retinal Prosthesis for Localized Histopathological Analysis: Part 2 Epiretinal Implants with Retinal Tacks
Published on: February 14, 2015