Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Myopotential interference in unipolar rate responsive pacemakers.

C P Lau1, N J Linker, G S Butrous

  • 1Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|August 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adverse effects of amiodarone at low dose: plus ça change.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·1997
Same author

Atrial premature beats preceding episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: factorial analysis of a prediction system.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·1997
Same author

Exercise-induced T-wave alternans as a marker of high risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Japanese circulation journal·1997
Same author

Elevated Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies, cardiovascular events, and azithromycin in male survivors of myocardial infarction.

Circulation·1997
Same author

Chlamydia pneumoniae and coronary heart disease.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1997
Same author

Amiodarone after myocardial infarction: EMIAT and CAMIAT trials.

Lancet (London, England)·1997

Myopotential interference affects over half of patients with unipolar rate-responsive pacemakers, causing temporary pacing inhibition. Adjusting pacemaker sensitivity can manage symptoms, but some cases require reprogramming or replacement.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cardiology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Unipolar rate-responsive pacemakers are susceptible to myopotential interference.
  • This interference can lead to inappropriate pacemaker inhibition or altered pacing behavior.
  • Understanding the prevalence and impact of myopotential interference is crucial for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the effects of myopotential interference on various unipolar rate-responsive pacemakers.
  • To identify provocative maneuvers that elicit myopotential interference.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of sensitivity adjustments and reprogramming in managing interference.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 22 patients with six types of unipolar rate-responsive pacemakers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized provocative tests, including arm exercises and specific maneuvers like pressing palms together.
  • Assessed pacemaker response in both VVI and rate-responsive modes.

    • Main Results:

    • 55% of patients experienced myopotential interference at nominal sensitivity settings.
    • Pressing palms together was the most sensitive provocative test.
    • While interference caused temporary inhibition, rate response often resumed quickly; however, some patients required reprogramming or pacemaker replacement.

    Conclusions:

    • Myopotential interference is a significant issue in unipolar rate-responsive pacemakers.
    • Sensitivity adjustment is often effective, but alternative programming or device replacement may be necessary for persistent symptoms.
    • Further research into pacemaker design and patient education is warranted.