Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns
Ladislav Gregor1, Serge Bouillaguet2, Ioana Onisor1
1Senior Lecturer, Division of Cariology and Endodontology, Dental School, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Statement Of The Problem:
The complete polymerization of luting resins through thick indirect restorations is still questioned.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of polymerization of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins under thick indirect composite resin and ceramic endocrowns by means of Vickers microhardness measurements.
Material And Methods:
The Vickers microhardness measurements of a light-polymerizable microhybrid composite resin and a dual-polymerizable luting cement directly polymerized in a natural tooth mold for 40 seconds with a high-power light-emitting diode lamp (control) were compared with measurements after indirect irradiation through 7.5-mm-thick composite resin and ceramic endocrowns for 3 × 90 seconds. A test-to-control microhardness values ratio of 0.80 at a depth of 0.5 mm below the surface was assumed as the criterion for adequate conversion.
Results:
For the Vickers microhardness measurements of a dual-polymerizable luting cement, no differences (P>.05) were found between Vickers microhardness control values and values reported after polymerization through composite resin and ceramic endocrowns. For The Vickers microhardness measurements (±SD) of a light-polymerizable microhybrid composite resin, control values were significantly (P<.05) higher (111 ±3.3) than those reported after polymerization through composite resin (100.5 ±3.8) and ceramic (99.7 ±2.3) endocrowns. However, the hardness values of The Vickers microhardness measurements of a light-polymerizable microhybrid composite resin polymerized through the endocrowns were approximately 10% to 12% lower than those of the control values. Two-way ANOVA showed the influence of the luting material on the Vickers microhardness values (P<.05). The effect of endocrown material was not significant (P>.05).
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this in vitro study, Vickers microhardness values of the dual-polymerizable resin cement and the light-polymerizable restorative composite resin irradiated for 3 × 90 seconds with a high irradiance light-emitting diode lamp through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns reached at least 80% of the control Vickers microhardness values, which means that both materials can be adequately polymerized when they are used for luting thick indirect restorations.
