Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

14.3K
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
14.3K
Gross Anatomy of Bone01:17

Gross Anatomy of Bone

14.3K
The two main features of a long bone are the diaphysis and the epiphysis.
The diaphysis is the tubular shaft that runs between the proximal and distal ends of the bone. The walls of the diaphysis are composed of dense and hard compact bone made of numerous osteons — the functional unit of the compact bone. The hollow region in the diaphysis is called the medullary cavity, which harbors the bone marrow. In infants and children, this marrow cavity is filled with red marrow, whereas in...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in Plantar Pressure Distribution Between Adults with Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Flexible Flatfeet During Walking and Heel-Strike Running.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Continental and demographic analysis of preoperative measurements in shoulder arthroplasty from a large-scale dataset using Materialise software for surgical planning.

JSES international·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Predictive Potential of Patient-Specific Biomechanical Models in Class III Protraction Therapy.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

From structure to function: Biomechanical markers of symptomatic flatfoot during running and a single leg drop and hop.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2025
Same author

Biomechanical characterization of the human pia-arachnoid complex using bulge inflation testing and the virtual fields method.

Acta biomaterialia·2025
Same author

Single Leg Drop and Hop: Insight Into Multisegment Foot Kinematics, Kinetics and the Role of Visual Focus in Healthy Young Adult Males.

Journal of foot and ankle research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
06:45

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy

Published on: November 28, 2025

335

Segmentation accuracy of long bones.

Joyce Van den Broeck1, Evie Vereecke2, Roel Wirix-Speetjens3

  • 1KU Leuven, Biomechanics Section, Celestijnenlaan 300C, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; Materialise NV, Technologielaan 15, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.

Medical Engineering & Physics
|April 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study found that both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer high accuracy for 3D bone reconstruction. Both methods are suitable for orthopaedic applications, with minimal dimensional errors.

Keywords:
Imaging accuracyMedical imagingOrthopaedicsThree-dimensional imaging

More Related Videos

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
09:36

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin

Published on: March 14, 2018

8.9K
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
06:45

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy

Published on: November 28, 2025

335
Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
09:36

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin

Published on: March 14, 2018

8.9K
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic surgery
  • Medical imaging
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Three-dimensional (3D) imaging is increasingly vital in orthopaedics for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • A need exists to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of 3D models derived from different imaging modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the absolute dimensional errors of 3D bone models reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to a ground truth.
  • To assess accuracy variations across different bone regions (diaphysis and epiphysis).

Main Methods:

  • Clinical CT and MRI scans were obtained from nine lower leg cadavers.
  • 3D models of the tibia were reconstructed from segmented CT and MRI data.
  • Models were compared against optical scans of cleaned bones, serving as the ground truth.

Main Results:

  • CT-based 3D reconstruction showed a Root Mean Square (RMS) error of 0.55 mm, with a slight overestimation of bone dimensions.
  • MRI-based 3D reconstruction yielded an RMS error of 0.56 mm, with a minor underestimation of bone dimensions.
  • Accuracy varied between the diaphysis and epiphysis, indicating region-specific performance.

Conclusions:

  • Both CT and MRI demonstrate high accuracy for 3D bone reconstruction in orthopaedic applications.
  • MRI technology is feasible for 3D bone reconstruction, offering a viable alternative to CT.
  • The findings support the integration of advanced imaging techniques for improved orthopaedic care.