Bioinformatics approach to evaluate differential gene expression of M1/M2 macrophage phenotypes and antioxidant genes

Ricardo Fagundes da Rocha1, Marco Antônio De Bastiani, Fábio Klamt

  • 1Laboratory of Cellular Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Health Basic Sciences (ICBS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos - 2600, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003, Brazil, 00140244@ufrgs.br.

Insights

Atherosclerosis involves increased human antioxidant genes (HAG) and M1 macrophage gene expression in advanced plaques. Macrophages from atherosclerotic subjects show higher HAG, M1, and M2 gene expression, suggesting no distinct polarization in this disease.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Biology
  • Immunology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Atherosclerosis is a pro-inflammatory condition linked to redox imbalances.
  • The roles of M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory) macrophages in atherosclerosis remain unclear.
  • Macrophages are key players in the development and progression of atherosclerotic plaques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare gene expression of human antioxidant genes (HAG) and M1/M2 macrophage markers in early versus advanced atherosclerotic plaques.
  • To analyze differential gene expression in peripheral macrophages and foam cells from healthy and atherosclerotic subjects.
  • To investigate macrophage polarization in the context of atherosclerosis.

Main Methods:

  • Meta-analysis of public microarray datasets (GSE28829, GSE9874) from the Gene Expression Omnibus.
  • Utilized STRING and Medusa for functional interaction analysis.
  • Statistical analysis performed using ViaComplex and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA).

Main Results:

  • Activity of HAG and M1 gene sets significantly increased in advanced compared to early atherosclerotic plaques.
  • Peripheral macrophages from atherosclerotic subjects showed increased HAG, M1, and M2 gene expression versus healthy subjects.
  • Foam cells from atherosclerotic subjects showed increased M1 gene expression, but unlike cancer, no distinct M1/M2 polarization was observed.

Conclusions:

  • In atherosclerosis, unlike cancer, macrophages do not exhibit distinct M1 or M2 polarization.
  • Both M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes appear to be equally induced in atherosclerosis.
  • Findings provide insights into disease progression and potential therapeutic strategies.

Related Concept Videos