Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Unconsciously competing goals can collaborate or compromise as well as win or lose
1Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. pcarruth@umd.edu http://faculty.philosophy.umd.edu/pcarruthers/
Abstract:
This commentary offers a friendly extension of Huang & Bargh's (H&B's) account. Not only do active goals sometimes operate unconsciously to dominate or preempt others, but simultaneously active goals can also collaborate or compromise in shaping behavior. Because neither goal wins complete control of behavior, the result may be that each is only partly satisfied.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
Competition
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Impact of Groups on Groups