Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

09:49
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
Published on: September 25, 2021
3.8K
Genes, hosts, goals: disentangling causal dependencies
1Kristianstad, Sweden SE-29194. gyr694c@tninet.se.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|April 30, 2014
Summary
This study analyzes Richard Dawkins's concept of "selfishness" in evolutionary theory. It concludes that goals, unlike genes, do not possess independent self-interest in relation to their pursuers.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Philosophy of Science
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Richard Dawkins popularized the concept of the "selfish gene" in evolutionary theory.
- This concept frames genes as independent entities pursuing their own propagation.
- The applicability of this concept to other domains, such as goals, warrants examination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the concept of "selfishness" as defined by Dawkins.
- To assess the applicability of this concept to the relationship between goals and individuals pursuing them.
- To determine if goals can be considered to have independent self-interest.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of Richard Dawkins's "selfish gene" theory.
- Comparative analysis of the gene-host relationship versus the goal-pursuer relationship.
- Philosophical examination of agency and self-interest in relation to abstract concepts.
Main Results:
- The concept of "selfishness" in evolutionary theory, as popularized by Dawkins, is specific to genes.
- Goals, unlike genes, do not exhibit analogous independent self-interest in relation to the individuals who hold and pursue them.
- The analogy between selfish genes and selfish goals breaks down upon closer examination.
Conclusions:
- The "selfish gene" concept does not directly translate to the relationship between goals and individuals.
- Goals lack the independent agency and self-interest attributed to genes in evolutionary theory.
- Understanding the distinct nature of goals is crucial for accurately applying evolutionary concepts to human behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Causality in Epidemiology
2.2K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.2K
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
1.5K
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
1.5K
Epistasis Analysis
4.9K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
4.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.7K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.7K
Human Genetics
2.0K
Human genetics provides a profound framework for understanding the interplay between genetic predispositions and human psychology. At the heart of this discipline lies the study of how genes influence physical traits, behaviors, and susceptibility to diseases. Each person carries a unique genetic code that subtly or significantly shapes their psychological and behavioral landscape.
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
2.0K

