Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Assessment of Human Natural Killer Cell Events Driven by FcγRIIIa Engagement in the Presence of Therapeutic Antibodies
Published on: May 22, 2020
Hypogammaglobulinaemia after rituximab treatment-incidence and outcomes
M Makatsori1, S Kiani-Alikhan2, A L Manson2
1From the Allergy Department, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK, Department of Immunology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK, Department of Immunology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK, Department of Immunology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospital, London, UK, King's College London, King's Health Partners, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, School of Medicine, Division of Asthma, Allergy & Lung Biology, Department of Immunological Medicine, London, UK, Department of Haematology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK and Center for Chronic Immunodeficiency, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany melina.makatsori08@imperial.ac.uk.
Background:
Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20, is increasingly used in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas and autoimmune conditions. Transient peripheral B-cell depletion is expected following rituximab therapy. Although initial clinical trials did not show significant hypogammaglobulinaemia, reports of this are now appearing in the literature.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective review of patients previously treated with rituximab that were referred to Clinical Immunology with symptomatic or severe hypogammaglobulinaemia. Patient clinical histories, immunological markers, length of rituximab treatment and need for intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IVIG) were evaluated. An audit of patients receiving rituximab for any condition in a 12-month period and frequency of hypogammaglobulinaemia was also carried out.
Results:
We identified 19 post-rituximab patients with persistent, symptomatic panhypogammaglobulinaemia. Mean IgG level was 3.42 ± 0.4 g/l (normal range 5.8-16.3 g/l). All patients had reduced or absent B-cells. Haemophilus Influenzae B, tetanus and Pneumococcal serotype-specific antibody levels were all reduced and patients failed to mount an immune response post-vaccination. Nearly all of them ultimately required IVIG. The mean interval from the last rituximab dose and need for IVIG was 36 months (range 7 months-7 years). Of note, 23.7% of 114 patients included in the audit had hypogammaglobulinaemia.
Conclusion:
With the increasing use of rituximab, it is important for clinicians treating these patients to be aware of hypogammaglobulinaemia and serious infections occurring even years after completion of treatment and should be actively looked for during follow-up. Referral to clinical immunology services and, if indicated, initiation of IVIG should be considered.
More Related Videos
07:25In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
10:35Assessment of Antibody-based Drugs Effects on Murine Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Macrophage Activation
Published on: December 26, 2017