Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.7K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.7K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

2.3K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
2.3K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

2.4K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
2.4K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

2.1K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
2.1K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

3.3K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.3K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

3.2K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

The Latest Data on Medical Aid in Dying in the United States and What It Tells Us.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2026
Same authorSame journal

What Should Be Our Utmost Goals in Teaching Medical Students Ethics.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2026
Same author

Looking to Our Own and Others' Emotions to Identify Ethical Challenges That We May Resolve Better.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2026
Same author

Helping Exceptionally Sensitive Patients See Their Sensitivity as a Gift.

Innovations in clinical neuroscience·2025
Same author

Nancy Dubler's Contributions to Clinical Ethics Consultation.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2025
Same author

Bridging Impasses Between Nurses and Providers.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2025
Same journal

How Should Physicians Interpret Legislatures' Lists of Exceptions to Abortion Restrictions?

The Journal of clinical ethics·2026
Same journal

ECMO Used for the Benefit of a Patient's Family: Case Study.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2026
Same journal

How Should Pregnancy-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Abortion-Restricted States Be Documented, Collected, and Reported After <i>Dobbs</i>?

The Journal of clinical ethics·2026
Same journal

How Should Researchers Study Abortion Care Later in Pregnancy After <i>Dobbs</i>?

The Journal of clinical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Ethically optimal interventions with impaired patients.

Edmund G Howe

    The Journal of Clinical Ethics
    |May 1, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Most patients with severe impairments, like quadriplegia, value their lives more than caregivers assume. Caregivers should avoid misperceptions and focus on supporting patients to prevent disability.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Rehabilitation Medicine
    • Patient-Centered Care

    Background:

    • Care providers often underestimate the quality of life for patients with severe impairments, such as quadriplegia or respirator dependence.
    • This misperception can lead to treatment decisions that may not align with the patient's own values and reported well-being.
    • Patients with significant impairments frequently report a high value for their own lives, contradicting external assumptions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe strategies for improving care for patients with severe impairments.
    • To challenge the assumption that severe impairments automatically equate to a poor quality of life.
    • To guide healthcare providers in making more informed and patient-centered treatment decisions.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of evidence regarding patient self-reported quality of life despite severe impairments.
    • Analysis of caregiver misperceptions in treatment decision-making for impaired patients.
    • Development of recommendations for patient care, emphasizing non-presumptive approaches.

    Main Results:

    • A significant discrepancy exists between caregiver assumptions and patient self-reports regarding quality of life.
    • Most patients with severe impairments report valuing their lives, even when dependent on life support.
    • Misperceptions can lead to suboptimal treatment decisions for patients with disabilities.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare providers should avoid presupposing a decreased quality of life for patients with impairments.
    • Care should involve understanding how external factors limit patient functioning and addressing these limitations.
    • The goal is to prevent impairments from leading to true disability by supporting patients holistically.