Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination
Published on: July 7, 2016
Flexibility of the transverse arch of the forefoot
Shintarou Kudo1, Yasuhiko Hatanaka2, Kenichirou Naka3
1Graduate School of Suzuka University of Medical Science, Japan; Department of Physical therapy, Morinomiya University of Medical Science, Japan.
Purpose:
To measure the percentage of the transverse arch length (%TAL) in 2 positions using a 3-dimensional motion capture system to determine the flexibility of the transverse arch of the forefoot.
Methods:
19 men and 10 women with no lower extremity injury or deformity were included. The %TAL of the left foot was measured using a digital caliper in the standing position and the lower leg maximum anterior tilting (LMAT) position. The difference in the %TAL between the 2 positions (δ%TAL) was calculated. 10 markers were mounted on skin over each metatarsal head and base of the left foot. Motion was captured using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. Coordinates of each marker were manually digitised. The percentage of the transverse arch height (%TAH) and angle between the first and fifth metatarsals (M1M5) were calculated, and differences in each forefoot parameter in the 2 positions were defined as δ%TAL, δ%TAH, δM1M5, and the fore foot flexibility magnitude (FFM) was calculated. Subjects were divided into 3 groups based on their δ%TAL: <25th percentile (hypo-flexibility group, n=7), >26th percentile to <74th percentile (control group, n=15), and >75th percentile (hyperflexibility group, n=7). The 3 groups were compared in terms of the δ%TAL. δ%TAH, δM1M5, and FFM.
Results:
The δ%TAL correlated with δM1M5 (r=0.61, p<0.001) and FFM (r=0.60, p=0.001). For the δM1M5, the hyper-flexibility group differed significantly from other groups (p=0.01). For the FFM, the hyperflexibility group differed significantly from the hypoflexibility group (p=0.02).
Conclusion:
Measurement of the %TAL in both the standing and LMAT positions provides a simple and quantitative method of assessing the flexibility of the transverse arch of the forefoot.
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Muscles of the Leg that Move the Foot and Toes
Anterior Compartment
The anterior compartment includes muscles that contribute to the dorsiflexion of the foot. This compartment houses the tibialis anterior, extensor hallucis longus, and extensor digitorum longus muscles....
Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula
Introduction to Joints
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...

