A randomized phase II study of cediranib alone versus cediranib in combination with dasatinib in docetaxel resistant,

Anna Spreafico1, Kim N Chi, Srikala S Sridhar

  • 1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Insights

Combining VEGFR and Src targeted therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) did not improve outcomes. Cediranib alone showed better progression-free survival than the combination with dasatinib in CRPC patients.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Research
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) and Src pathway activation are implicated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) development.
  • Cediranib (VEGFR inhibitor) and dasatinib (Src inhibitor) have demonstrated single-agent activity in CRPC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining cediranib and dasatinib in docetaxel-pretreated CRPC patients.
  • To compare the combination therapy against cediranib monotherapy in terms of progression-free survival.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized Phase II study involving 22 CRPC patients pretreated with docetaxel.
  • Patients were assigned to cediranib alone (Arm A) or cediranib plus dasatinib (Arm B) for 4-week cycles.
  • Primary endpoint was 12-week progression-free survival (PFS), with patient-reported outcomes and bone turnover markers assessed.

Main Results:

  • Twelve-week PFS was significantly higher in the cediranib-alone arm (73%) compared to the combination arm (18%) (p=0.03).
  • Median PFS was 5.2 months for cediranib alone versus 2.6 months for the combination.
  • Common toxicities included hypertension, anemia, and thrombocytopenia; one treatment-related death occurred in the combination arm.

Conclusions:

  • The combination of VEGFR and Src targeted therapy did not improve efficacy in CRPC patients.
  • The combination therapy may be associated with worse outcomes compared to VEGFR targeted therapy alone.
  • Further investigation is warranted, considering the limitations of small sample size.