Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Validity and reliability of Persian translated version of Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Scoring System Questionnaire
1Associate professor, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Ali-Asghar Children Hospital, Pediatric Transplantation and Dialysis Research Center (PTDRC), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. nhooman@tums.ac.ir , nakisa45@yahoo.com.
Insights
The Persian version of the Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Scoring System (PLUTSS) is a valid and reliable tool for screening children with urinary tract symptoms. Minor cultural adaptations may enhance its understandability.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Clinical Assessment Tools
- Questionnaire Validation
Background:
- The Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Scoring System (PLUTSS) assesses wetting, voiding frequency, and patterns in children.
- It aids in screening and evaluating treatment response for pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
- This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Persian-translated PLUTSS in Iranian children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PLUTSS.
- To establish the reliability and validity of the translated questionnaire for use in a pediatric population.
- To determine its utility in screening children with LUTS.
Main Methods:
- 197 children (5-15 years) with urinary tract infection, voiding dysfunction, or enuresis were enrolled.
- 33 healthy children served as controls.
- Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (ICC), and validity (ANOVA, ROC curve) were assessed.
Main Results:
- The Persian PLUTSS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.82).
- The ROC curve identified a cut-point of 5 for differentiating cases from controls with high sensitivity (97.0%) and specificity (74.9%).
- Significant differences in PLUTSS scores were observed across patient groups and controls (p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- The Persian translation of the PLUTSS is a valid and reliable instrument for screening pediatric urinary tract symptoms.
- Cultural adaptation of certain questions may improve comprehensibility and applicability within the Iranian context.
- The tool shows promise for clinical use in evaluating children with LUTS.
Background:
Pediatric lower urinary tract scoring system (PLUTSS) is a questionnaire contains items for assessmentof wetting episodes, voiding frequency and pattern. It is used for screening and evaluation of the responseof children with lower urinary tract symptoms to therapy. We studied the validity and reliability of Persiantranslated version of this questionnaire among Iranian children.
Methods:
One hundred and ninety-seven children aged 5-15 years with urinary tract infection, voiding dysfunction,enuresis were enrolled in this study. Thirty-three healthy age-matched children without urinary complaintwere considered as controls. PLUTSS questionnaire was filled out for all children. Sonography was performedto rule out urogenital abnormalities. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity of the questionnairewere assessed using Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlation coefficient, and ANOVA test respectively.ROC curve was used to define cut-point and its validity in discrimination between groups. P-value < 0.05was considered significant.
Results:
The means for PLUTSS items were 6.8 (±5.4) for voiding dysfunction, 14.4(±5) for enuresis,10.5(±7.8) for recurrent and 8.9(±6) for single urinary tract infection, and 1.9(±1.8) for controls (p<0.001).Cronbach's alpha for the 14 items of questionnaire was 0.74. The intraclass coefficient correlation for assessingtest-retest reliability was 0.82 (p<0.001). ROC curve showed cut point of 5 for differing case from controls withsensitivity of 97.0 and specificity of 74.9(p<0.001).
Conclusions:
Persian translated PLUTSS has a proper validity and reliability as an instrument for screeningchildren with urinary tract symptoms but some questions need to be changed in some way to be understandableby our culture.
More Related Videos
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
04:22Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System III: Percussion and Auscultation
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System II: Inspection and Palpation