Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan01:13

Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan

722
Radiological investigations are paramount in the diagnosis and management of various pulmonary diseases. Two essential investigations are the Pulmonary Angiogram and the Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
722
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

1.8K
Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and...
1.8K
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan01:30

Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan

1.0K
Description
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
1.0K
Positron Emission Tomography01:29

Positron Emission Tomography

6.2K
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique involving radiopharmaceuticals — substances that emit short-lived radiation. Although the first PET scanner was introduced in 1961, it took 15 more years before radiopharmaceuticals were combined with the technique and revolutionized its potential.
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
6.2K
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy01:25

Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy

853
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique that provides crucial insights into the body's physiological functions at a molecular level. It is an indispensable resource for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring various illnesses, notably cancer, neurological disorders, and cardiovascular conditions.
Fundamental Principles of PET
853
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography01:22

Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

3.5K
IntroductionIntravenous Urography (IVU) and Retrograde Pyelography (RP) are important diagnostic imaging techniques used to evaluate the urinary system. These methods help identify structural abnormalities, obstructions, and functional issues in the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. Both procedures use iodine-based contrast media to enhance the visibility of urinary tract structures on X-ray images, though they differ in their methods and indications.1. Intravenous Urography (IVU)Intravenous...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active Surveillance for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Journal of breast imaging·2024
Same author

The Intersection of Diversity and Well-Being.

Academic radiology·2023
Same author

Impact of Longitudinal Focused Academic Time on Resident Scholarly Activity.

Academic radiology·2022
Same author

Preserving Radiology Resident Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Simulated Daily Readout.

Academic radiology·2020
Same author

Assessing the impact of an orientation week on acclimation to radiology residency.

Clinical imaging·2020
Same author

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Lobular Neoplasia: Update and Easing of Guidelines.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K

BI-RADS update.

Cecilia L Mercado1

  • 1Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Cancer Institute, 160 East 34th Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Radiologic Clinics of North America
|May 6, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article provides an overview of the latest revisions to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, which aims to improve how doctors interpret images and standardize reporting across different medical technologies.

Keywords:
BI-RADSBI-RADS atlasBreastBreast imagingLexiconBreast imagingDiagnostic standardsClinical guidelinesMedical lexicon

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
09:49

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods

Published on: April 24, 2020

9.1K
Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

47.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K
A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
09:49

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods

Published on: April 24, 2020

9.1K
Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

47.8K

Area of Science:

  • Diagnostic radiology and BI-RADS clinical standards
  • Medical imaging informatics and quality assurance

Background:

No prior work had resolved the inconsistencies in reporting standards across diverse breast imaging platforms. Existing guidelines often lacked the clarity needed for consistent clinical interpretation by radiologists. That uncertainty drove the need for a comprehensive update to current diagnostic frameworks. Prior research has shown that standardized terminology is essential for tracking patient outcomes effectively. This gap motivated the development of a more universal lexicon for medical professionals. Previous versions of these diagnostic tools struggled to maintain uniformity across multiple imaging modalities. The field required a cohesive approach to ensure that findings remain comparable regardless of the technology utilized. These challenges highlighted the necessity for the latest revisions released by the American College of Radiology.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this article is to summarize the recent updates and changes made to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. This revision addresses the need for clearer image interpretation protocols in clinical practice. The authors seek to explain how the new edition maintains reporting standardization across the medical community. A major motivation is to simplify the monitoring of patient outcomes through improved diagnostic documentation. The study examines the introduction of a new, universal lexicon for all three imaging modalities. Researchers intend to clarify how these changes impact the daily work of radiologists. By outlining these modifications, the article provides a guide for professionals adapting to the new standards. The work serves to ensure that the core goals of the system are understood by the broader medical field.

Main Methods:

The review approach involved a systematic examination of the latest American College of Radiology guidelines. Analysts evaluated the modifications made to existing diagnostic frameworks to identify key changes. The team focused on how the new lexicon integrates into current clinical workflows. Investigators assessed the impact of updated terminology on the three primary imaging modalities. This process included a comparison of previous reporting standards against the current revised edition. The authors synthesized information regarding the intended improvements in image interpretation. They scrutinized the structural adjustments designed to facilitate better outcome tracking. This methodology ensured a comprehensive overview of the updated reporting system.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that the primary goal remains the improvement of clarity in image interpretation. The updated system successfully introduces a universal lexicon for all three imaging modalities. Results show that these changes are designed to maintain reporting standardization across the field. The authors report that the revisions simplify the monitoring of patient outcomes significantly. Data suggests that the new terminology replaces older, less consistent descriptors. Findings confirm that the core mission of the system remains unchanged from previous editions. The literature highlights that the updates address long-standing challenges in diagnostic uniformity. The analysis demonstrates that the revised edition provides a more cohesive framework for radiologists.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that these revisions will enhance the clarity of image interpretation for clinicians. Synthesis and implications indicate that reporting standardization remains a primary objective for the updated system. Experts propose that the new terminology will facilitate better tracking of patient outcomes over time. The updated framework aims to simplify monitoring processes across all three imaging modalities. Researchers emphasize that the new lexicon provides a more universal language for diagnostic reporting. These changes are intended to support consistent communication among medical teams. The authors conclude that the updated system maintains the core mission of previous editions. This work provides a foundation for more uniform diagnostic practices in breast imaging.

The researchers propose that the updated lexicon improves clarity in image interpretation and simplifies outcome monitoring. By providing a universal language, the system ensures that findings are consistent across all three imaging modalities, including mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.

The authors introduce a new, universal lexicon designed to be applied across all three imaging modalities. This terminology replaces older, fragmented descriptors to ensure that radiologists use identical language when documenting findings, regardless of the specific technology employed during the examination.

The authors state that standardization is necessary to ensure that image interpretation remains consistent across different clinical settings. This uniformity allows for better tracking of patient outcomes and reduces ambiguity in diagnostic reports, which is vital for effective long-term monitoring of breast health.

The updated system uses a standardized lexicon as a data type to categorize findings. This role is vital for maintaining uniformity, as it allows for the aggregation of diagnostic information across various imaging platforms, thereby simplifying the comparison of results for clinicians.

The authors measure the effectiveness of the system by its ability to simplify the monitoring of outcomes. They propose that by streamlining how radiologists report findings, the system makes it easier to track patient progress and evaluate the success of diagnostic interventions over time.

The researchers propose that these updates will lead to more precise communication among healthcare providers. By adopting a universal language, the authors claim that clinicians can better interpret complex images, ultimately supporting the core mission of improving diagnostic accuracy and patient care.