Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

1.3K
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
1.3K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

3.8K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.8K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

924
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
924
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.8K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.8K
Automated Microbial Diagnostics01:24

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

77
Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...
77
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

3.9K
A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why and How to Monitor Deployed AI Systems in Health Care.

NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery·2026
Same author

BRIDGE: benchmarking large language models for understanding real-world clinical practice texts.

Nature biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Physician-Reported Safety Outcomes of AI-Generated Hospital Course Summaries.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

A narrative review of considerations when assessing potential relationships between Guillain-Barré syndrome and vaccines.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

Retrieval-Augmented Guardrails for AI-Drafted Patient-Portal Messages: Error Taxonomy Construction and Large-Scale Evaluation.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same author

MedFactEval and MedAgentBrief: A Framework and Workflow for Generating and Evaluating Factual Clinical Summaries.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

5.7K

An algorithm developed using the Brighton Collaboration case definitions is more efficient for determining diagnostic

Deepa Joshi1, Emily Alsentzer1, Kathryn Edwards1

  • 1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Light Hall, 2215 Garland Avenue, Mailbox #43, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

Vaccine
|May 6, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new algorithm for diagnosing anaphylaxis, developed by the Brighton Collaboration, proved more efficient than the standard case definition. This vaccine safety tool improved diagnostic speed without compromising accuracy in a medical student trial.

Keywords:
Adverse events following immunizationBrighton CollaborationVaccine safety monitoring

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.2K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

5.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.2K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Vaccinology
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The Brighton Collaboration is a global network for vaccine safety research.
  • Standardized case definitions are crucial for assessing adverse events following immunization (AEFI).
  • Current multi-page case definitions can be inefficient for clinical use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a user-friendly algorithm for the Brighton Collaboration's anaphylaxis case definition.
  • To compare the efficiency and accuracy of the new algorithm against the standard case definition.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized trial was conducted involving 40 medical students.
  • Participants assessed a sample case of anaphylaxis using either the standard case definition or the new algorithm.
  • Primary outcomes measured were diagnostic efficiency (time taken) and accuracy (correct Brighton Level determination).

Main Results:

  • Both the algorithm and the standard definition yielded similar accuracy in determining the Brighton Level of diagnostic certainty.
  • Participants using the algorithm demonstrated significantly greater efficiency, requiring less time (mean difference=107s) to assess the case.
  • Statistical significance was achieved with p=0.026, indicating a reliable improvement in speed.

Conclusions:

  • The developed algorithm enhances the efficiency of using Brighton Collaboration case definitions for anaphylaxis.
  • The algorithm provides a faster method for assessing diagnostic certainty without sacrificing accuracy.
  • This tool can streamline vaccine safety evaluations and adverse event reporting.