Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Eukaryotic Transcription Inhibitors

Eukaryotic Transcription Inhibitors

Certain biochemical processes, such as embryonic development and cell growth regulation, depend on the repression of specific genes. DNA binding proteins known as eukaryotic transcription inhibitors regulate the repression of gene expression in eukaryotes. The presence of these inhibitors at the required location and time in the cell is triggered by the presence of hormones and additional signals from other cells.
Eukaryotic transcription inhibitors usually contain two distinct domains, a...

Feedback Inhibition

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cross-modal applications of a neuromorphic olfactory learning algorithm.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Sleep and diurnal alternative polyadenylation sites associated with human APA-linked brain disorders.

Npj biological timing and sleep·2024

Same author

Sleep and diurnal alternative polyadenylation sites associated with human APA-linked brain disorders.

Research square·2024

Same author

Sensitivity analysis of point neuron model simulations implemented on neuromorphic hardware.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023

Same author

Bats possess the anatomical substrate for a laryngeal motor cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023

Same author

On the value of diverse organisms in auditory research: From fish to flies to humans.

Hearing research·2023

Same journal

Physiological load and breath-holding in artistic swimming: a scoping review establishing historical baselines and evidence gaps in the context of the 2022-2025 rule changes.

Frontiers in physiology·2026

Same journal

Effects of blood flow restriction exercise interventions on patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in physiology·2026

Same journal

Effects of resistance-type and cycling-type high-intensity interval training on cardiorespiratory fitness, lower-body strength, and anaerobic fitness.

Frontiers in physiology·2026

Same journal

Model-based estimates of sex differences in peak power and fatigue index in track cyclists using directed acyclic graphs, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and Bayesian modeling.

Frontiers in physiology·2026

Same journal

Fine-tuning striated muscle performance: conserved sarcomere-level mechanisms across insect and vertebrate systems.

Frontiers in physiology·2026

Same journal

Effects of different dual-task trainings on gait and cortical activation during obstacle crossing in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in physiology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Published on: September 3, 2015

Inhibition does not affect the timing code for vocalizations in the mouse auditory midbrain.

Alexander G Dimitrov¹, Graham I Cummins¹, Zachary M Mayko²

¹Department of Mathematics, Washington State University Vancouver Vancouver, WA, USA.

Frontiers in Physiology

|May 6, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Inhibition in the mouse auditory midbrain does not significantly shape neural responses to vocalizations. Blocking inhibitory receptors increased response rates but did not alter spike timing or selectivity.

Keywords:

information inhibition mouse IC neural coding selectivity spike timing

More Related Videos

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Published on: September 3, 2015

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Auditory System
Animal Communication

Background:

Animals use complex acoustic signals for communication.
Neural coding in the auditory system distinguishes vocalizations via selectivity or spike timing.
The role of inhibition in auditory midbrain (inferior colliculus) neural coding is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of inhibition in shaping neural selectivity to vocalizations in the mouse inferior colliculus (IC).
To determine if inhibition influences rate coding and/or time coding of vocalization information.

Main Methods:

Extracellular single-unit recordings in awake mice.
Pharmacological blockade of GABAA and glycine receptors in the IC.
Analysis of neuronal responses using raster plots, spike counts, mutual information, and event sequence distance metrics.

Main Results:

Blocking inhibition increased neuronal response rates to vocalizations.
Spike timing and stimulus selectivity of IC neurons were not significantly affected by blocking inhibition.
Highly selective neurons maintained selectivity, while broadly responsive neurons showed increased firing without altered timing patterns.

Conclusions:

Inhibition in the mouse IC does not play a substantial role in creating distinguishable temporal spike patterns for vocalizations.
The auditory system may rely on intrinsic neuronal properties rather than inhibition for precise vocalization discrimination via timing.