Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for endemic nephropathy

Diagnosis of endemic nephropathy (EN) is based on the combination of several clinical and laboratory criteria. Despite extensive research no specific diagnostic biomarker for EN has yet been identified. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of the variables previously proposed as diagnostic criteria, but also new ones. After an extended questionnaire, the clinical and laboratory examination population in EN villages was classified according to the modified WHO criteria. The urinary active form of TGF-β was measured with a bioassay using a cell line which expresses luciferase activity. In the study we used ROC analysis to examine the predictive value of the tested variables. In the study there was no difference in haemoglobin level between the study subgroups. Leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) in urine and active urinary TGF-β levels were increased in the EN diseased group when compared to other subgroups, but they did not fulfil the statistical criteria needed for differentiating a diseased form from other study subgroups. Both kidney length and parenchima thickness, alfa1-microglobulinuria, and kidney function assessed by MDRD formula were the variables that differentiated the study subgroups well. Based on our results the cut-off value of alfa1-microglobulin for screening should be 23.5 mg/g creatinine instead of 15 mg/g creatinine in the present criteria, and for making a diagnosis of EN 31,5 mg/g creatinine. Persons with a positive family history for EN had a 5.8 times greater risk of developing EN when compared to a negative one. Taken together, the above-mentioned variables should be implemented in new uniform diagnostic criteria for EN.