You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 21, 2024
Yulin V Chang1, James D Quirk, Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
1Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
This study explores using a faster scanning technique called parallel imaging to measure lung structure with specialized helium gas scans. Researchers compared standard scans to accelerated versions in healthy people and patients with lung disease. They found that the faster method produces reliable results similar to traditional scans, potentially making lung testing quicker and more comfortable for patients.
02:09Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Published on: April 12, 2024
08:26Quantitative Mapping of Specific Ventilation in the Human Lung using Proton Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Oxygen as a Contrast Agent
Published on: June 5, 2019
Area of Science:
Background:
No prior work had resolved how to optimize scan duration for detailed lung microstructure assessment using specialized gas-based magnetic resonance imaging. That uncertainty drove researchers to investigate whether modern acceleration strategies could maintain diagnostic accuracy. It was already known that traditional data collection methods often require lengthy acquisition times, which can be challenging for patients with respiratory limitations. This gap motivated the exploration of parallel imaging techniques to improve clinical efficiency. Prior research has shown that hyperpolarized helium gas provides unique insights into alveolar dimensions. However, the trade-off between scan speed and image quality remains a significant hurdle in pulmonary diagnostics. This study addresses the need for faster protocols that do not compromise the precision of morphometric measurements. The authors sought to determine if these advanced reconstruction algorithms could effectively replace standard, slower data acquisition approaches.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this proof-of-concept study is to investigate the effects of parallel imaging on the morphometric measurement of lung microstructure. Researchers sought to determine if this technique could effectively reduce the time required for hyperpolarized gas magnetic resonance imaging. A secondary goal involved evaluating whether spatial coverage could be improved through these acceleration strategies. The authors addressed the challenge of lengthy acquisition times, which often limit the utility of specialized gas scans in clinical settings. By testing generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions, the team explored a potential solution for optimizing imaging workflows. This study was motivated by the need to make advanced pulmonary diagnostics more accessible and efficient for patients. The researchers focused on whether the accelerated data could provide results comparable to standard, fully sampled imaging protocols. Ultimately, the work establishes a foundation for using faster reconstruction methods to assess lung health in diverse patient populations.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved evaluating a parallel imaging reconstruction technique known as generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions. Investigators acquired multi-b diffusion data from human participants using an 8-channel receive coil. The team compared fully sampled datasets against those processed with the acceleration algorithm. Participants included healthy volunteers alongside individuals diagnosed with mild or moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This design allowed for a direct assessment of how under-sampling affects the precision of structural lung measurements. The researchers focused on maintaining high data fidelity while reducing the total time required for image capture. By applying this specific reconstruction framework, the study tested the feasibility of faster scan protocols. The methodology ensured that comparisons were made under controlled conditions to validate the reliability of the accelerated results.
Main Results:
The strongest finding from the literature indicates that morphometric measurements varied only slightly when applying mild acceleration factors to the collected data. Results remained largely well preserved across different lung conditions when compared to traditional fully sampled images. The study confirms that no significant difference exists in the measurement of lung morphometry between the two approaches. Researchers observed that the generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions technique successfully reconstructed under-sampled k-space information. This outcome suggests that the accelerated method provides a reliable alternative for assessing lung microstructure. The data demonstrate that sufficient signal-to-noise ratios are vital for the success of these faster imaging protocols. These findings hold true for both healthy subjects and those suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The evidence supports the conclusion that imaging time can be significantly reduced without sacrificing the quality of the morphometric output.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that parallel imaging offers a dependable strategy for shortening scan durations in hyperpolarized gas studies. Their findings suggest that morphometric data remain consistent even when using moderate acceleration factors during the reconstruction process. This approach appears to preserve diagnostic information across various lung health conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The researchers indicate that sufficient signal strength is a prerequisite for maintaining measurement accuracy with these accelerated protocols. By reducing acquisition time, this methodology may improve patient comfort and overall clinical throughput in pulmonary imaging centers. The study demonstrates that generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions can successfully reconstruct under-sampled data without introducing significant errors. These results imply that faster imaging workflows are feasible for assessing lung microstructure in both healthy and diseased populations. Future clinical applications could leverage these techniques to enhance spatial coverage while keeping scan times within manageable limits for individuals with compromised breathing.
The researchers propose that parallel imaging, specifically generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions, enables faster data collection. This mechanism maintains measurement accuracy by reconstructing under-sampled k-space data, which shows no significant difference compared to fully sampled images in healthy volunteers or patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The study utilized an 8-channel helium-3 receive coil to capture diffusion data. This hardware component is necessary for the parallel imaging reconstruction technique to function effectively by providing the spatial information required to fill in missing data points during the acceleration process.
The researchers state that a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio is necessary to maintain measurement reliability. If the signal strength drops too low during the acceleration process, the morphometric results may become less accurate, highlighting the importance of balancing speed with image quality in this imaging modality.
The authors used multi-b diffusion data to assess lung microstructure. This data type allows for the calculation of morphometric parameters, such as alveolar size, by measuring how gas molecules move within the lung spaces during the scan.
The study measured lung morphometry across three distinct groups: healthy volunteers, individuals with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These measurements varied only slightly at mild acceleration factors, indicating robustness across different levels of lung health.
The researchers propose that this technique is a promising way to significantly reduce imaging time. They also suggest it could improve spatial coverage, potentially allowing for more comprehensive lung assessments that were previously limited by the time constraints of traditional gas-based magnetic resonance imaging.