Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Progress testing: is there a role for the OSCE?
Debra Pugh1, Claire Touchie, Timothy J Wood
1Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Context:
The shift from a time-based to a competency-based framework in medical education has created a need for frequent formative assessments. Many educational programmes use some form of written progress test to identify areas of strength and weakness and to promote continuous improvement in their learners. However, the role of performance-based assessments, such as objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), in progress testing remains unclear.
Objective:
The aims of this paper are to describe the use of an OSCE to assess learners at different stages of training, describe a structure for reporting scores, and provide evidence for the psychometric properties of different rating tools.
Methods:
A 10-station OSCE was administered to internal medicine residents in postgraduate years (PGYs) 1-4. Candidates were assessed using a checklist (CL), a global rating scale (GRS) and a training level rating scale (TLRS). Reliability was calculated for each measure using Cronbach's alpha. Differences in performance by year of training were explored using analysis of variance (anova). Correlations between scores obtained using the different rating instruments were calculated.
Results:
Sixty-nine residents participated in the OSCE. Inter-station reliability was greater (0.88) using the TLRS compared with the CL (0.84) and GRS (0.79). Using all three rating instruments, scores varied significantly by year of training (p < 0.001). Scores from the different rating instruments were highly correlated: CL and GRS, r = 0.93; CL and TLRS, r = 0.90, and GRS and TLRS, r = 0.94 (p < 0.001). Candidates received feedback on their performance relative to examiner expectations for their PGY level.
Conclusions:
Scores were found to have high reliability and demonstrated significant differences in performance by year of training. This provides evidence for the validity of using scores achieved on an OSCE as markers of progress in learners at different levels of training. Future studies will focus on assessing individual progress on the OSCE over time.
More Related Videos
06:15Author Spotlight: Anterior HR-OCT as a Non-Invasive Tool for Characterizing Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia
Published on: August 9, 2024
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Nursing Evaluation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...