Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation
Deepti Dua1, Ankur Dua1, Veerendra M Uppin2
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Private Practice, New Delhi, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, India.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe.
Materials And Methods:
Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and shaping with ProTaper rotary files. In one group, final irrigation was performed with an EndoVac system while in the other group final irrigation was performed with a 30 gauge Max-I probe. 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetracetic acid were used as final irrigants in all teeth. After instrumentation and irrigation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally into buccal and palatal halves and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation of the smear layer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results:
The EndoVac group showed significantly better smear layer removal compared with the Max-I probe at the apical 1 mm level.
Conclusion:
An apical negative pressure system (EndoVac) results in better debridement at apical 1 mm when compared with side-vented closed ended needle irrigation (Max-I probe).
