Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Preclinical optimization of MDM2 antagonist scheduling for cancer treatment by using a model-based approach
Brian Higgins1, Kelli Glenn2, Antje Walz3
1Authors' Affiliations: Discovery Oncology; brian_x.higgins@Roche.com.
Purpose:
Antitumor clinical activity has been demonstrated for the MDM2 antagonist RG7112, but patient tolerability for the necessary daily dosing was poor. Here, utilizing RG7388, a second-generation nutlin with superior selectivity and potency, we determine the feasibility of intermittent dosing to guide the selection of initial phase I scheduling regimens.
Experimental Design:
A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model was developed on the basis of preclinical data to determine alternative dosing schedule requirements for optimal RG7388-induced antitumor activity. This PKPD model was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of RG7388 linked to the time-course of the antitumor effect in an osteosarcoma xenograft model in mice. These data were used to prospectively predict intermittent and continuous dosing regimens, resulting in tumor stasis in the same model system.
Results:
RG7388-induced apoptosis was delayed relative to drug exposure with continuous treatment not required. In initial efficacy testing, daily dosing at 30 mg/kg and twice a week dosing at 50 mg/kg of RG7388 were statistically equivalent in our tumor model. In addition, weekly dosing of 50 mg/kg was equivalent to 10 mg/kg given daily. The implementation of modeling and simulation on these data suggested several possible intermittent clinical dosing schedules. Further preclinical analyses confirmed these schedules as viable options.
Conclusion:
Besides chronic administration, antitumor activity can be achieved with intermittent schedules of RG7388, as predicted through modeling and simulation. These alternative regimens may potentially ameliorate tolerability issues seen with chronic administration of RG7112, while providing clinical benefit. Thus, both weekly (qw) and daily for five days (5 d on/23 off, qd) schedules were selected for RG7388 clinical testing.
Insights
Intermittent dosing of RG7388, an MDM2 antagonist, shows antitumor activity comparable to continuous dosing. This strategy may improve patient tolerability for cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Preclinical Research
Background:
- MDM2 antagonists like RG7112 show antitumor effects but have poor tolerability with daily dosing.
- RG7388 is a more potent and selective second-generation MDM2 antagonist.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the feasibility of intermittent dosing for RG7388.
- To guide the selection of initial phase I clinical trial dosing schedules.
- To potentially improve patient tolerability compared to continuous dosing.
Main Methods:
- Developed a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model using preclinical data.
- Investigated RG7388 pharmacokinetics and antitumor effects in an osteosarcoma xenograft mouse model.
- Predicted and tested intermittent and continuous dosing regimens for tumor stasis.
Main Results:
- Continuous RG7388 treatment did not require delayed apoptosis.
- Daily 30 mg/kg and twice-weekly 50 mg/kg RG7388 showed equivalent efficacy in the tumor model.
- Weekly 50 mg/kg and daily 10 mg/kg RG7388 were also statistically equivalent.
- Modeling and simulation identified viable intermittent dosing schedules.
Conclusions:
- Antitumor activity with RG7388 can be achieved via intermittent schedules, not just chronic administration.
- Intermittent RG7388 regimens may reduce tolerability issues associated with RG7112.
- Weekly and five-day on/23-day off schedules were selected for clinical testing.
More Related Videos
10:09Methods for Evaluating the Role of c-Fos and Dusp1 in Oncogene Dependence
Published on: January 7, 2019
08:57Sample Extraction and Simultaneous Chromatographic Quantitation of Doxorubicin and Mitomycin C Following Drug Combination Delivery in Nanoparticles to Tumor-bearing Mice
Published on: October 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...