Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Application of a Coupling Agent to Improve the Dielectric Properties of Polymer-Based Nanocomposites
Published on: September 19, 2020
Metal ion release: also a concern for ceramic-on-ceramic couplings?
Alina Beraudi1, Susanna Stea, Dalila De Pasquale
12 Lab. PROMETEO-RIT, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna - Italy.
This study investigated whether a new ceramic hip implant material, BIOLOX delta, releases chromium ions into the body. Researchers measured chromium levels in blood, erythrocytes, and urine of patients with these implants and compared them to people without implants. Chromium levels in both groups were within normal ranges, suggesting the ceramic material does not release harmful amounts of chromium. The findings indicate that BIOLOX delta is a safe alternative to metal-on-metal implants in terms of metal ion release.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic implant toxicology
- Ceramic material biocompatibility
- Metal ion release in joint prostheses
Background:
Metal-on-metal hip implants have raised concerns due to elevated chromium and cobalt ion levels in patients. These ions may lead to toxic effects, prompting a search for safer alternatives. Ceramic-on-ceramic couplings are considered a viable option, but their potential for metal ion release remains understudied. While prior research has shown that some metal prostheses release ions into bodily fluids, the behavior of ceramic composites is less clear. This gap motivated researchers to investigate whether chromium ions from ceramic materials could also enter the bloodstream. No prior work had resolved whether ceramic composites might pose similar risks. The need for a non-metal alternative has driven interest in ceramic prostheses. However, the safety of these materials in terms of ion release is still debated. Understanding the biocompatibility of ceramic composites is essential for their broader adoption.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to assess whether chromium ions from a specific ceramic composite, BIOLOX delta, are released into the blood, erythrocytes, and urine of patients with hip implants. The researchers focused on comparing ion levels in patients with BIOLOX delta implants to those without implants. The motivation stemmed from concerns about metal ion toxicity in other implant types. By measuring chromium levels in biological samples, the team sought to determine if ceramic composites could also contribute to systemic ion exposure. The study's goal was to evaluate the safety of ceramic-on-ceramic couplings in terms of chromium release. Researchers wanted to confirm whether the trivalent chromium in the ceramic material could be released in vivo. The findings could help clarify whether ceramic implants are truly safer alternatives. This investigation supports the broader goal of improving implant safety and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
The study involved 20 patients with total hip arthroplasty using BIOLOX delta-BIOLOX delta couplings and 21 control subjects without implants. Blood, serum, erythrocytes, and urine samples were collected from all participants. Chromium ion concentrations were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with a dynamic reaction cell. The method allowed precise detection of trace metal ions. Researchers normalized erythrocyte and urine samples to account for variations in volume and concentration. The control group provided baseline ion levels for comparison. All samples were analyzed in the same laboratory to ensure consistency. The study design enabled direct comparison of ion levels between the two groups.
Main Results:
Chromium ion levels in the THA group were as follows: blood mean 0.21 µg/l (±0.09), serum 0.21 µg/l (±0.12), normalized erythrocytes 0.13 µg/l (±0.09), and normalized urine 0.12 µg/g creatinine (±0.13). In the control group, blood mean was 0.22 µg/l (±0.14), serum 0.17 µg/l (±0.08), normalized erythrocytes 0.13 µg/l (±0.11), and normalized urine 0.07 µg/g creatinine (±0.08). All values in both groups fell within the reference ranges for chromium. The reference range for blood was 0.1-5.0 µg/l, for serum 0.1-0.5 µg/l, for normalized erythrocytes 0.14-4.58 µg/l, and for urine 0.05-2.2 µg/l. No significant differences were observed between the two groups. These results suggest that chromium levels from BIOLOX delta implants are not elevated. The findings indicate that the material does not release harmful amounts of chromium ions.
Conclusions:
The study found that chromium ion levels in patients with BIOLOX delta implants were within normal reference ranges. The authors propose that the trivalent chromium in the ceramic composite does not lead to elevated ion concentrations in blood or urine. These findings suggest that BIOLOX delta is safe in terms of chromium release. The results support the use of ceramic-on-ceramic couplings as a safer alternative to metal-on-metal implants. The researchers conclude that the material does not pose a risk of systemic chromium toxicity. The study does not claim that all ceramic composites are equally safe. The findings are specific to the BIOLOX delta material tested. The authors emphasize the importance of continued monitoring of implant materials for ion release.
Frequently Asked Questions
The study found chromium ion levels in patients with BIOLOX delta implants were within normal ranges, suggesting no significant release.
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with a dynamic reaction cell was used to analyze blood, serum, erythrocytes, and urine samples.
Normalization allowed for accurate comparison of chromium levels by accounting for variations in sample volume and concentration.
Trivalent chromium is chemically bound in the material, and the study aimed to determine if it could be released in vivo.
Blood: 0.1-5.0 µg/l; serum: 0.1-0.5 µg/l; normalized erythrocytes: 0.14-4.58 µg/l; urine: 0.05-2.2 µg/l.
The findings support the use of BIOLOX delta as a safer alternative to metal-on-metal implants in terms of chromium release.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Complexation Equilibria: Overview
The equilibrium constant of the complexation reaction is represented as the formation constant...
Bonding in Metals
Formation of Complex Ions

