Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding

Enteral nutrition delivers nutrients directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube. This method is appropriate for patients who cannot eat but still have a functioning digestive system. It is also beneficial for individuals with swallowing difficulties, anorexia, malabsorption, or those who have undergone gastrointestinal (GI) surgery.
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Research at the Paris Foundling Hospital, Part 1: Until and during the Revolution.

Neonatology·2026

Same author

Research at the Paris Foundling Hospital, Part 2: After the Revolution.

Neonatology·2026

Same author

Tabula Rasa? A History of Fetal Learning and Neonatal Perception.

Neonatology·2025

Same author

"Enriching the Hospital's Scientific Fame": Research at the Vienna Foundling Hospital.

Neonatology·2024

Same author

"Flux in the Belly:" A History of Infantile Gastroenteritis.

Neonatology·2024

Same author

For Exposed and Deserted Young Children: Research at the London Foundling Hospital.

Neonatology·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development

Published on: April 19, 2024

Technical inventions that enabled artificial infant feeding.

Michael Obladen¹

¹Department of Neonatology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

|May 14, 2014

Summary

Technical innovations from 1844-1886, including rubber teats and milk pasteurization, significantly improved infant artificial feeding safety. Commercial infant formula producers adopted these advancements, while household use remained risky due to hygiene gaps.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Published on: June 9, 2023

Recapitulating Suckling-to-Weaning Transition In Vitro using Fetal Intestinal Organoids

Recapitulating Suckling-to-Weaning Transition In Vitro using Fetal Intestinal Organoids

Published on: November 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development

Published on: April 19, 2024

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Published on: June 9, 2023

Recapitulating Suckling-to-Weaning Transition In Vitro using Fetal Intestinal Organoids

Recapitulating Suckling-to-Weaning Transition In Vitro using Fetal Intestinal Organoids

Published on: November 15, 2019

Area of Science:

Historical medical technology
Infant nutrition science
Public health advancements

Background:

Artificial infant feeding (hand-feeding) posed significant health risks throughout the 19th century.
Limited understanding of microbial pathogens contributed to the dangers of infant formula preparation and storage.
Lack of standardized equipment exacerbated risks in private households.

Observation:

Key technical innovations emerged rapidly between 1844 and 1886.
These included rubber vulcanization, rubber teat production, industrial ice production, milk pasteurization, and canning.
Crucially, most innovations predated the identification of pathogenic bacteria.

Findings:

Commercial infant formula manufacturers quickly integrated these technological advancements.
Proprietary infant formulas benefited from improved preservation and preparation methods.
The adoption of innovations was uneven, with commercial producers outpacing household practices.

Implications:

Technological progress, even before germ theory, dramatically enhanced infant feeding safety.
The study highlights the critical role of industrial innovation in public health.
Divergence in adoption between industry and households underscores challenges in translating scientific advancements into widespread safe practices.