Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Mass Spectrometry and Luminogenic-based Approaches to Characterize Phase I Metabolic Competency of In Vitro Cell Cultures
Published on: March 28, 2017
Merits and potential downsides of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol management guidelines
Insights
New cholesterol guidelines offer statin therapy for four groups, including high-risk individuals. Controversies surround risk assessment algorithms and the "lower is better" approach for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Clinical Guidelines
Background:
- The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association released new cholesterol management guidelines in November 2013.
- These guidelines introduced significant changes compared to the previous Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.
- The new guidelines sparked considerable debate and controversy upon their release.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify patient groups who can benefit from statin therapy.
- To address the contentious aspects of the new guidelines, particularly primary prevention strategies.
- To evaluate the implications of the revised risk assessment algorithm and the elimination of lipid targets.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the four identified categories for statin therapy eligibility.
- Examination of the risk assessment algorithm for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
- Review of evidence regarding low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets and non-statin drug recommendations.
Main Results:
- Four categories of individuals, including three high-risk groups, are identified for statin therapy.
- The primary prevention category and its associated risk algorithm faced significant criticism.
- The revised algorithm improves risk assessment for women and African Americans compared to previous methods.
- The elimination of specific lipid targets, particularly for LDL-C, contradicts the "lower is better" principle supported by evidence.
Conclusions:
- The new guidelines emphasize a multifactorial approach to cardiovascular risk reduction.
- Physicians are encouraged to discuss lifestyle modifications for lowering overall patient risk.
- While the risk algorithm is an improvement, further refinement is possible.
- Recommendations for non-statin drugs may evolve with future research.
Abstract:
New guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association on cholesterol management introduced substantial changes from the previous Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines and generated an immediate storm of controversy upon their release in November 2013. Four categories of individuals that can benefit from statin therapy, including three high-risk groups, have been identified. The fourth category of primary prevention has proven to be the most contentious, with criticism centering on the algorithm used to estimate ten-year risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and the optimal threshold for statin therapy. Although the risk assessment algorithm can be further refined, it represents an improvement from the previous calculator since it better captures risk in women and African Americans. However, the elimination of lipid targets in the new guidelines discounts a wealth of clinical trial and epidemiological evidence indicating that, with regards to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, "lower is better." Recommendations regarding the use of nonstatin drugs, while appropriate, could potentially be revised in the future. In general, the new guidelines stress the necessity of addressing the multiple factors that contribute to cardiovascular risk, and they provide a valuable opportunity for physicians to address the importance of lifestyle modifications to lower a patient's overall risk.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management

