[Methohexital for analgosedation of ventilated intensive care patients : prospective nonrandomized single center observational study on incidence of delirium]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
1Abteilung für Anästhesie und perioperativen Medizin, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Röntgenstr. 20, 63225, Langen, Deutschland, d.volz@asklepios.com.
Background:
Delirium is defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) as a potentially reversible disturbance of consciousness and a change of cognition caused by a medical condition, drug intoxication, or medication side effect. Delirium affects up to 80 % of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. One risk factor for development of delirium in ventilated intensive care unit patients is sedation. The German S3 guidelines on "Analgesie, Sedierung und Delirmanagement in der Intensivmedizin" (analgesia, sedation and delirium management in intensive care medicine) of the DGAI (German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine) and the DIVI (German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine) recommend midazolam and propofol for sedation, although both drugs are associated with a high incidence of delirium.
Aim:
Within the framework of this study the question arose whether the barbiturate methohexital could be associated with a lower incidence of delirium in comparison to midazolam or propofol in analgosedated and ventilated ICU patients.
Material And Methods:
This was a prospective nonrandomized observational cohort study in a mixed medical surgical intensive care unit. Patients ventilated within 72 h after admittance were consecutively allocated to either propofol/remifentanil versus methohexital/remifentanil (expected ventilation duration ≤ 7 days) or midazolam/fentanyl versus methohexital/fentanyl (expected ventilation duration > 7 days) by the attending senior consultant anesthetist at the time of admission and/or intubation. Primary endpoint was delirium at any time during the ICU stay. Delirium was checked every 8 h by ICU nurses using the intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC), with delirium defined as ICDSC ≥ 4 points. Before evaluation of the ICDSC the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) score and the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS target ≤ 4) were measured. To assure reliable evaluation of the ICDSC, the RASS score of the patient at the time of evaluation had to be ≥ - 2. Assuming an incidence of delirium in the midazolam group of 70 % and in the methohexital group of 35 %, 16 patients were needed each in the midazolam/fentanyl and the methohexital/fentanyl cohorts (p = 0.05, β = 0.1). Assuming an incidence of delirium in the propofol group of 50 % and in the methohexital group again of 35 %, 94 patients were needed in the propofol/remifentanil and methohexital/remifentanil groups, respectively (p = 0.05, β = 0.1).
Results:
A total of 222 patients were evaluated, 34 in the methohexital vs. midazolam group and 188 in the methohexital vs. propofol group. Out of 16 patients sedated with midazolam, 15 developed delirium (94 %) in contrast to only 5 out of 18 patients sedated with methohexital (28 %). Thus compared to midazolam the sedation with methohexital reduced the incidence of delirium by 66 % (p < 0.001) corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 1.5. Out of 94 patients in the propofol/remifentanil group, 64 developed delirium (68 %) in contrast to only 23 out of 94 in the methohexital/remifentanil group (24 %). Thus compared to propofol the sedation with methohexital reduced the incidence of delirium by 44 % (p < 0.001), corresponding to an NNT of 2.5.
Conclusion:
Sedation with methohexital compared to midazolam or propofol reduced the incidence of delirium by more than 50 % in ventilated ICU patients.
Insights
In intensive care units (ICUs), methohexital sedation significantly reduced delirium incidence by over 50% compared to midazolam and propofol. This finding offers a safer sedation option for ventilated patients, improving outcomes and reducing complications.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Delirium is a common, serious complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, affecting up to 80% and increasing morbidity and mortality.
- Sedation is a known risk factor for delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
- Current guidelines recommend midazolam and propofol for sedation, despite their association with high delirium rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the barbiturate methohexital is associated with a lower incidence of delirium compared to midazolam or propofol in analgosedated and ventilated ICU patients.
- To evaluate methohexital as a potentially safer alternative for sedation in critical care settings.
- To compare the efficacy of methohexital against standard sedatives in preventing delirium.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, nonrandomized observational cohort study was conducted in a mixed medical-surgical ICU.
- Patients were allocated to receive either propofol/remifentanil or methohexital/remifentanil for short-term ventilation (≤7 days), or midazolam/fentanyl or methohexital/fentanyl for longer-term ventilation (>7 days).
- Delirium was assessed every 8 hours using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), with a score of ≥4 indicating delirium. Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) and Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS) were also monitored.
Main Results:
- Sedation with methohexital reduced delirium incidence by 66% compared to midazolam (28% vs. 94%, NNT=1.5).
- Compared to propofol, methohexital reduced delirium incidence by 44% (24% vs. 68%, NNT=2.5).
- A total of 222 patients were evaluated, with significant reductions in delirium observed in the methohexital groups.
Conclusions:
- Methohexital sedation significantly decreases the incidence of delirium in ventilated ICU patients compared to midazolam and propofol.
- The study suggests methohexital is a more favorable sedative agent for ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation, associated with a substantially lower risk of delirium.
- These findings support the consideration of methohexital as a preferred agent for analgosedation in critical care to mitigate delirium.
More Related Videos
04:56In Vitro Method to Control Concentrations of Halogenated Gases in Cultured Alveolar Epithelial Cells
Published on: October 23, 2018
08:49Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
Published on: October 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Barbiturates
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...