Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Multimodality Diagnosis of Mesenteric Ischemia
Published on: July 21, 2023
Retrograde open mesenteric stenting for acute mesenteric ischemia
Juliette T M Blauw1, Robert Meerwaldt2, Marjolein Brusse-Keizer3
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Objective:
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) encompasses the sequels of end-stage untreated chronic mesenteric ischemia and acute mesenteric artery thrombosis. Percutaneous mesenteric artery stenting (PMAS) is the preferred treatment of patients with AMI but is not always feasible. Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is a hybrid technique that combines the advantages of open surgical and endovascular approaches. The literature on the results of this new technique is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of ROMS in a consecutive series of patients with AMI.
Methods:
All patients with emergent mesenteric revascularization for AMI between January 2007 and September 2011 were entered in our prospective registry. Technical success, mortality, patency, clinical success, and complication rate at 30 days and 6 and 12 months were assessed.
Results:
Sixty-eight patients presented with AMI and 54 underwent PMAS, of which four were unsuccessful and followed by ROMS. Eleven patients were directly treated with ROMS, making a total of 15 patients (10 women and five men; median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 54-73 years]). In all patients, only the superior mesenteric artery was revascularized. In nine of the 15 patients, all three mesenteric arteries were severely stenotic or occluded. Technical success was achieved in 14 patients. At ROMS in two patients, the small bowel was severely ischemic. One of these patients needed a partial bowel resection because of irreversible transmural ischemia. At 30 days, the mortality rate was 20% and the primary patency was 92%. Ten patients underwent unplanned relaparotomy, of whom one needed resection of a large part of the small bowel. At 12 months, the mortality rate was still 20%. The primary patency was 83%. Primary assisted patency was 91%, and secondary patency was 100%. Clinical success at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively, was 73%, 67%, and 67%.
Conclusions:
AMI is still a devastating event. If PMAS is not feasible, ROMS is a reliable alternative and is associated with a relatively low mortality and morbidity rate.
Insights
Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is a viable alternative for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) when percutaneous mesenteric artery stenting (PMAS) fails. ROMS offers a reliable option with acceptable outcomes for AMI patients.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a critical condition with high mortality.
- Percutaneous mesenteric artery stenting (PMAS) is the primary endovascular treatment for AMI.
- PMAS is not always technically feasible, necessitating alternative approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical outcomes of Retrograde Open Mesenteric Stenting (ROMS) in patients with AMI.
- To assess the technical success, mortality, patency, and complication rates of ROMS.
- To determine ROMS's reliability as an alternative to PMAS when it is not feasible.
Main Methods:
- Prospective registry of patients undergoing emergent mesenteric revascularization for AMI (January 2007 - September 2011).
- Data collection included technical success, mortality, patency, clinical success, and complications at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months.
- Analysis of 15 patients treated with ROMS (either directly or after failed PMAS).
Main Results:
- Technical success was achieved in 14 out of 15 patients.
- At 30 days, mortality was 20% and primary patency was 92%.
- At 12 months, mortality remained 20%, primary patency was 83%, and clinical success was 67%.
Conclusions:
- Retrograde Open Mesenteric Stenting (ROMS) is a reliable alternative for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia (AMI) when PMAS is not feasible.
- ROMS is associated with a relatively low mortality and morbidity rate in this patient cohort.
- Despite its effectiveness, AMI remains a devastating event requiring prompt intervention.
More Related Videos
07:05Visualization of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Mesenteric Venules After Mesenteric Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Intravital Microscopy
Published on: September 27, 2024
06:29Rodent Model of Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Occlusion of the Superior Mesenteric Artery
Published on: October 20, 2023