Retrograde open mesenteric stenting for acute mesenteric ischemia

Juliette T M Blauw1, Robert Meerwaldt2, Marjolein Brusse-Keizer3

  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Insights

Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is a viable alternative for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) when percutaneous mesenteric artery stenting (PMAS) fails. ROMS offers a reliable option with acceptable outcomes for AMI patients.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a critical condition with high mortality.
  • Percutaneous mesenteric artery stenting (PMAS) is the primary endovascular treatment for AMI.
  • PMAS is not always technically feasible, necessitating alternative approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes of Retrograde Open Mesenteric Stenting (ROMS) in patients with AMI.
  • To assess the technical success, mortality, patency, and complication rates of ROMS.
  • To determine ROMS's reliability as an alternative to PMAS when it is not feasible.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective registry of patients undergoing emergent mesenteric revascularization for AMI (January 2007 - September 2011).
  • Data collection included technical success, mortality, patency, clinical success, and complications at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months.
  • Analysis of 15 patients treated with ROMS (either directly or after failed PMAS).

Main Results:

  • Technical success was achieved in 14 out of 15 patients.
  • At 30 days, mortality was 20% and primary patency was 92%.
  • At 12 months, mortality remained 20%, primary patency was 83%, and clinical success was 67%.

Conclusions:

  • Retrograde Open Mesenteric Stenting (ROMS) is a reliable alternative for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia (AMI) when PMAS is not feasible.
  • ROMS is associated with a relatively low mortality and morbidity rate in this patient cohort.
  • Despite its effectiveness, AMI remains a devastating event requiring prompt intervention.

Related Concept Videos