Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2020
Responsiveness of self-report measures in individuals with vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness
Lauren A Friscia1, Michael T Morgan, Patrick J Sparto
1*Department of Physical Therapy, †Department of Physical Therapy and Otolaryngology, ‡Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A, and Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Ridayh, Saudi Arabia.
Objective:
The responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of many self-report measures commonly used with individuals who have balance and vestibular dysfunction has not been assessed. The purpose of this study was to determine the responsiveness of 4 self-report measures including the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and Vestibular Activities and Participation (VAP) scale in people seeking treatment for vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness.
Study Design:
A prospective descriptive study.
Patients:
Forty-five patients (mean age, 56 yr; range, 18-79 yr) with vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness were included.
Main Outcome Measures:
Participants completed the measures at their initial physician examination and 4 to 6 weeks later. The follow-up visit included a Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC). The change in total scores for each self-report measure from initial visit to follow-up visit were recorded and compared against the GROC. A Spearman correlation was performed to determine the relationship between all 4 self-report measures and the GROC. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also used to evaluate responsiveness.
Results:
Significant correlations were found between the GROC and ABC (ρ = 0.50), DHI (ρ = 0.61), and FES-I (ρ = 0.36) but not the VAP (ρ = 0.27). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was significantly greater than 0.5 for the ABC, DHI, and FES-I.
Conclusion:
The DHI demonstrated the greatest responsiveness, with an optimal cutoff of a change in 3 points related to significant change.
More Related Videos
05:02Using Unidirectional Rotations to Improve Vestibular System Asymmetry in Patients with Vestibular Dysfunction
Published on: August 30, 2019
06:18Assessing the Autonomic and Behavioral Effects of Passive Motion in Rats using Elevator Vertical Motion and Ferris-Wheel Rotation
Published on: February 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Equilibrium and Balance
The Vestibular System