Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

05:00
Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Dry Eye Owing to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Published on: April 1, 2019
14.8K
Repeatability of grading meibomian gland dropout using two infrared systems
William Ngo1, Sruthi Srinivasan, Marc Schulze
1*OD, FAAO †PhD, BSOptom, FAAO ‡PhD, Dipl Ing(AO), FAAO §PhD, FCOptom, FAAO Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Summary
Repeatability of meibomian gland dropout grading was assessed using OCULUS Keratograph devices. While grading showed good repeatability, the K4 and K5M instruments are not interchangeable for dropout percentage measurement.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Meibomian gland (MG) dysfunction is a common cause of dry eye disease.
- Meibography is a non-invasive technique to visualize and assess MG dropout.
- Standardized grading scales are crucial for reliable assessment of MG dropout.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver repeatability of meibomian gland dropout grading using OCULUS Keratograph 4 (K4) and 5M (K5M) devices.
- To compare the results obtained from the K4 and K5M devices for semiobjective quantification of MG dropout.
- To explore the correlation between meibography scores and clinical signs of dry eye.
Main Methods:
- 40 participants underwent meibography using K4 and K5M devices, with images taken thrice per eye.
- Two observers graded meibomian gland dropout using a four-point scale on two separate occasions.
- Semiobjective percentage dropout was quantified using ImageJ, and a seven-point scale was also evaluated.
Main Results:
- Both K4 and K5M showed good interobserver and intraobserver repeatability for MG dropout grading, especially with a seven-point scale (CCC up to 0.95).
- However, there was significant disagreement (21.8% coefficient of repeatability) in percentage dropout measurements between K4 and K5M images.
- Meibography scores did not correlate with clinical signs but showed a high correlation with percentage dropout.
Conclusions:
- The OCULUS K4 and K5M devices demonstrate similar inter- and intraobserver repeatability for grading meibomian gland dropout.
- The significant disagreement in percentage dropout suggests K4 and K5M are not interchangeable for this specific measurement.
- A finer grading scale may improve the detection of changes in meibomian gland dropout.

