Genes that bias Mendelian segregation

Pierre Grognet1, Hervé Lalucque1, Fabienne Malagnac1

  • 1Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut des Energies de Demain, Paris, France; Univ Paris Sud, Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Bât. 400, Orsay, France.

Plos Genetics
|May 17, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Meiotic Drive Elements (MDs) like Spore Killers in Podospora anserina can override inheritance laws. These elements possess both killing and protective functions on the same allele, acting as novel selfish genetic elements.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Mycology

Background:

  • Mendelian inheritance can be circumvented by Meiotic Drive Elements (MDs).
  • MDs are genetic loci that distort meiotic segregation in their favor.
  • These elements are found across various eukaryotic genomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and characterize Spore Killer 1 (Spok1) and Spore Killer 2 (Spok2) in the model fungus Podospora anserina.
  • To elucidate the genetic mechanisms and functional activities of these Meiotic Drive Elements.
  • To investigate their potential as novel selfish genetic elements.

Main Methods:

  • Genetic analysis of Podospora anserina.
  • Cytological studies of Spok protein localization.
  • Comparative genomics of Spok gene families.

Main Results:

  • Spok1 and Spok2 were identified as related genes with dual spore-killing and spore-protecting activities on the same allele.
  • These alleles function autonomously, independent of genomic location, and can act as MDs in other fungi.
  • Spok1 confers resistance to Spok2-mediated killing, indicating a complex interaction.

Conclusions:

  • Spok1 and Spok2 represent a novel class of selfish genetic elements driving meiotic distortion in fungi.
  • These elements belong to a multigene family prevalent in ascomycetes.
  • Their proliferation occurs through meiotic drive, independent of a discernible cellular role.

Related Concept Videos

Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
58.0K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
46.5K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

Overview
61.3K
Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance01:39

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

In 1866, Gregor Mendel published the results of his pea plant breeding experiments, providing evidence for predictable patterns in the inheritance of physical characteristics. The significance of his findings was not immediately recognized. In fact, the existence of genes was unknown at the time. Mendel referred to hereditary units as “factors.”
43.6K
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

Overview
78.8K
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
19.0K