Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 20, 2018
Implementation and preliminary outcomes of a comprehensive oral chemotherapy management clinic
Siu-Fun Wong1, Mark Bounthavong2, Cham Nguyen2
1Siu-Fun Wong, Pharm.D., FASHP, FCSHP, is Professor and Associate Dean of Assessment and Scholarship, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA; at the time of writing, he was Professor, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda, CA. Mark Bounthavong, Pharm.D., is Pharmacoeconomics Clinical Specialist, Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA. Cham Nguyen, Pharm.D., is Pharmacist Specialist, St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, CA. Kezia Bechtoldt, Pharm.d., is Resident Pharmacist, Loma Linda University Medical Center. Elvin Hernandez, D.P.H., M.P.H., MCHES, is Associate Professor, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy. sfwong@chapman.edu.
Purpose:
Improved outcomes achieved by an oral chemotherapy management (OCM) clinic, including a reduction in the need for medication-related interventions, are reported.
Summary:
A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of an OCM clinic providing comprehensive medication therapy management (MTM) services, including education on various oral chemotherapy agents, concurrent medications, and symptom management, as well as insurance assistance. Patient demographics, self-rated depression scores, and data on concurrent medication use, types of interventions, and intervention outcomes were collected at baseline and at follow-up visits for up to three months. Thirty clinic patients (9 men and 21 women with a mean age of 64.5 years) were evaluated; the majority had advanced-stage cancer and no live-in caregiver. On average, the patients had 2.8 comorbid conditions, including hypertension (43%), chronic pain (43%), and diabetes (37%), and were taking 12.7 concurrent medications (range, 3-26). In general, OCM clinic interventions in five categories (adverse events, adherence, drug interactions, medication errors, and symptom management) decreased during the measured time periods. About 70% of OCM clinic interventions were associated with positive outcomes (i.e., complete resolution of event or improved response to therapy), with 67% and 36% of interventions resulting in potential cost avoidance and cost savings, respectively. Rates of optimal oral chemotherapy adherence and persistence were estimated at 70%.
Conclusion:
An OCM clinic with comprehensive MTM services was effective in delivering early interventions, resulting in decreased rates of adverse effects, nonadherence, drug interactions, and medication errors over time.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...