Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isolation of Epidermal and Hair Follicle Melanocytes.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Structural mechanisms of cargo adaptors in membrane trafficking.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same author

Deprivation scores and NHS practice payment trends in England 2018-2019 to 2023-2024:a multivariable analysis.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

Body-weight support is the primary driver of elevated walking cost in cerebral palsy.

Research square·2026
Same author

Exploring the utility of dynamic motor control to assess recovery following pediatric traumatic brain injury: A pilot study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Influence of body weight support on motor control in typically developing children and children with cerebral palsy.

Journal of biomechanics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults
09:37

Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults

Published on: May 12, 2016

8.4K

The comparison of normative reference data from different gait analysis services.

Ornella Pinzone1, Michael H Schwartz2, Pam Thomason3

  • 1University of Salford, UK.

Gait & Posture
|May 17, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing gait analysis data from two leading services revealed high consistency, suggesting harmonized protocols are achievable. This study provides a method and baseline for other services to assess their gait data collection performance.

Keywords:
KinematicsKineticsNormative-datasets comparisonStandardization between services

More Related Videos

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults
08:56

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults

Published on: November 7, 2014

13.5K
Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder
06:54

Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder

Published on: March 4, 2018

17.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults
09:37

Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults

Published on: May 12, 2016

8.4K
Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults
08:56

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults

Published on: November 7, 2014

13.5K
Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder
06:54

Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder

Published on: March 4, 2018

17.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Clinical Biomechanics
  • Gait Analysis

Background:

  • Harmonizing gait analysis data collection protocols across different services is crucial for reliable comparisons.
  • Existing normative data may exhibit variations due to differing methodologies.
  • Standardized data is essential for accurate clinical interpretation and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a method for comparing normative gait data between different clinical services.
  • To assess the consistency of kinematic and kinetic data between two highly respected gait analysis centers.
  • To establish a benchmark for evaluating the performance of other gait analysis services.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized root mean square (RMS) difference from the inter-service mean to identify systematic protocol variations.
  • Analyzed average standard deviation to account for within-center measurement variability.
  • Compared substantial normative datasets from two leading clinical gait analysis services.

Main Results:

  • RMS differences were below 1.7° for most kinematic variables, with hip rotation (2.9°) and foot progression (2.1°) showing slightly larger variations.
  • Joint moments consistently showed RMS differences below 0.1 Nm/kg.
  • Joint powers demonstrated RMS differences under 0.21 W/kg.
  • Both centers exhibited very similar normative standard deviations, indicating high data reliability.

Conclusions:

  • Demonstrated a high degree of consistency between normative data from two reputable gait analysis services.
  • Validated a method for comparing gait analysis data, providing a baseline for other services.
  • The findings support the potential for harmonizing gait analysis protocols and data collection.