Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Clinical features and diagnostic reliability in paediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux
Tomislav Baudoin1, Andro Kosec1, Ivana Samardzija Cor2
1Department of Otorhinolarygology and Head and Neck Surgery, Clinical Hospital Centre Sestre milosrdnice, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Vinogradska cesta 29, Zagreb, Croatia.
Insights
This study validates diagnostic methods for pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux (PLPR), finding clinical exams highly sensitive but pH monitoring crucial for select cases. A new risk score aids diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
Background:
- Pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux (PLPR) diagnosis relies on clinical assessment and pH monitoring.
- Current diagnostic validity for PLPR requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of current approaches for pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux (PLPR).
- To develop a clinically useful probability score for PLPR diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 89 pediatric patients.
- Utilized oropharyngoscopy, nasal fiber optic laryngoscopy, and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.
- Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests.
Main Results:
- 50 out of 89 patients were diagnosed with PLPR.
- Clinical findings showed 92% sensitivity and 10.26% specificity for PLPR.
- Boys exhibited higher GERD prevalence and worse pH monitoring results (p<0.0001).
- A novel risk stratification correlated significantly with positive PLPR diagnosis (p=0.0262).
Conclusions:
- Thorough clinical evaluation remains essential for diagnosing PLPR.
- 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring offers additional diagnostic benefit in specific pediatric cases.
- Patient stratification aids in timely, cost-effective diagnosis and treatment planning.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to assess the validity of current diagnostic approaches in pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux (PLPR). Clinical status findings and 24h double probe oesophageal pH monitoring results in children with suspected PLPR and/or GERD were analyzed and a clinically useful probability score was developed.
Methods:
This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study including 89 pediatric patients who underwent preliminary oropharyngoscopy, and then nasal fibre optic laryngoscopy and ambulatory 24h oesophageal pH monitoring in a tertiary pediatric and otorhinolaryngology hospital center. The patients' parents gave written informed consent for diagnostic testing. Statistical analysis was performed using standard descriptive statistics. Associations between variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric paired samples.
Results:
Patients' age spanned 1-18 years with a median of 11.2. Out of the 89 patients, 56 were girls, and 33 were boys. All of the patients underwent nasal fibre optic laryngoscopy and 24h double probe pH monitoring. Out of 89 examined children, 50 had PLPR. Out of the 50 positive for PLPR, 46 had a positive clinical finding, with a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 80.75-97.73%) and specificity of 10.26% (95% CI: 2.93-24.24%). Boys have GERD significantly more often than girls (p<0.0001), and have a worse result of pH monitoring (p<0.0001). The most common finding was an injected and granulated oropharynx accompanied by posterior laryngitis (54/89). Patients with leading symptoms of asthma had significantly worse GERD scores (p=0.0493). The patients were then reassigned to newly developed risk categories and a significant correlation with a positive PLPR diagnosis was found (p=0.0262).
Conclusions:
The significance of a thorough otorhinolaryngologic and paediatric examination and patient history taking is still paramount, with additional benefit in diagnosing the disease arising from 24h oesophageal pH monitoring in select patients. This study brings to light new relationships between clinical symptoms and objective findings and presents a novel attempt to classify the likelihood of diagnosis. Patient stratification could help clinicians in defining groups at high risk and support a timely, cost-effective and precise diagnostic evaluation and proper therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Chronic Pharyngitis
Etiology
It often arises from persistent viral or bacterial infections affecting sinuses and tonsils.
Additional contributing factors include inadequate dental hygiene, mouth breathing, recurring tonsillitis, allergic rhinitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and exposure to smoke, chemicals, and other environmental pollutants. Allergic reactions to pollen, mold, and pet dander, chronic cough, excessive voice usage,...

