Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

52.0K
Overview
52.0K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

16.2K
16.2K
Proofreading01:31

Proofreading

7.6K
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore,  it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
7.6K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.8K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.8K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

44.1K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
44.1K
Production Efficiency01:01

Production Efficiency

15.5K
Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).
15.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Challenges in the New Zealand (NZ) healthcare system and health disparities in the Māori population.

Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench·2026
Same author

Resection Depth of Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Tumors.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Is it feasible for surgical trainees to acquire JAG endoscopy accreditation by CCT? National online survey of UK trainees.

International journal of colorectal disease·2026
Same author

Safety and efficacy of scissor-type knives in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: International multicenter observational study.

Endoscopy international open·2025
Same author

Nonceliac Wheat Sensitivity: Bridging Research, Clinical Experience, Uncertainties, and Future Perspective.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2025
Same author

Simplified Zenker's diverticulum endoscopic myotomy performed with a new bipolar scissor device.

Endoscopy·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K

How to evaluate a manuscript for publication?

Kamran Rostami1, Kayvan Khadjooi2, Randa Abasaeed-Elhag3

  • 1Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust ; School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, UK.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench
|May 17, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new assessment tool to systematically evaluate scientific studies for publication in medical journals. This tool aims to improve the quality and constructive criticism of research papers during peer review.

Keywords:
Manuscript evaluationMedical journalsPeer review

More Related Videos

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
05:52

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis

Published on: November 21, 2013

13.6K
Evaluation of Substrate Ubiquitylation by E3 Ubiquitin-ligase in Mammalian Cell Lysates
09:47

Evaluation of Substrate Ubiquitylation by E3 Ubiquitin-ligase in Mammalian Cell Lysates

Published on: May 10, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K
Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
05:52

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis

Published on: November 21, 2013

13.6K
Evaluation of Substrate Ubiquitylation by E3 Ubiquitin-ligase in Mammalian Cell Lysates
09:47

Evaluation of Substrate Ubiquitylation by E3 Ubiquitin-ligase in Mammalian Cell Lysates

Published on: May 10, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Publishing
  • Scientific Peer Review
  • Research Evaluation

Background:

  • Peer review is essential for ensuring the quality and validity of scientific publications.
  • Current methods for evaluating study merit can be inconsistent.
  • Effective peer review requires systematic assessment of research design and execution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a systematic assessment tool for evaluating the merit of scientific studies.
  • To enhance the effectiveness and consistency of the peer review process.
  • To facilitate comprehensive evaluation and constructive criticism of manuscripts.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing guidelines for study evaluation.
  • Development of a novel assessment tool based on established principles.
  • Systematic application of the tool for evaluating scientific studies.

Main Results:

  • The developed assessment tool provides a structured approach to evaluating study merit.
  • Implementation of the tool can lead to more effective and systematic peer review.
  • The tool aids in identifying strengths and weaknesses of research for constructive feedback.

Conclusions:

  • The new assessment tool offers a valuable method for enhancing the quality of scientific publications.
  • Systematic evaluation through this tool supports rigorous scientific communication.
  • This approach contributes to maintaining high standards in medical journal publications.