Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
Published on: January 19, 2018
High-accuracy measurement of the differential scalar polarizability of a 88Sr+ clock using the time-dilation effect
Pierre Dubé1, Alan A Madej1, Maria Tibbo1
1Frequency and Time Group, Measurement Science and Standards Portfolio, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0R6.
Abstract:
We report a high-accuracy measurement of the differential static scalar polarizability Δα(0) of the 5s(2)S(1/2)-4d(2)D(5/2) transition of the (88)Sr(+) ion. The high accuracy is obtained by comparing the micromotion-induced positive scalar Stark shift to the negative time-dilation shift. Measurement of the trap drive frequency where these shifts cancel is used to determine Δα(0) without the need to determine the electric field. Δα(0) is a critical parameter for the operation of frequency standards as it determines the blackbody radiation frequency shift coefficient, the largest source of uncertainty in the (88)Sr(+) ion clock. The measured value of Δα(0) is -4.7938(71) × 10(-40) J m(2)/V(2). Taking into account the dynamic correction, the blackbody shift at 300 K is 0.247,99(37) Hz. The contribution of the blackbody shift coefficient to the uncertainty of the ion standard has been reduced by a factor of 24, from 2 × 10(-17) to 8.3 × 10(-19). The revised total uncertainty of our reference standard is 1.2 × 10(-17), limited by the blackbody field evaluation. An additional benefit of the low uncertainty of Δα(0) is the ability to suppress, by a factor of about 200, the net micromotion frequency shifts.
Related Concept Videos
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
Ostwald’s Dilution Law
Kohlraush’s Law and its Applications
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...
Measuring Reaction Rates
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects

