Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Implantation of Total Artificial Heart in Congenital Heart Disease
Published on: July 18, 2014
Should a Cardiologist be the Principal Attending Physician or the Consultant to a Hospitalist or General Internist
1Program Director, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Florida Hospital Medical Center, 2501 North Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL 32804. E: george.everett.md@flhosp.org.
Insights
For hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients, cardiologists as attending physicians may improve efficiency and lower costs, especially for procedures. Mortality and readmissions showed no significant differences among physician groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
- Hospital Administration
Background:
- Cardiologists can serve as attending physicians or consultants for hospitalized patients with cardiovascular diseases.
- Determining the optimal physician role (cardiologist, hospitalist, or general internist) is crucial for healthcare quality and efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficiency and quality of care provided by cardiologists, general internists, and hospitalists in managing hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients.
- To evaluate differences in hospital cost, length of stay, mortality, and 30-day readmissions based on the attending physician's specialty.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study analyzed 15,113 patients across 11 cardiovascular diagnosis groups.
- Hospital cost, length of stay, mortality, and 30-day readmissions were compared between attending physicians: hospitalists, general internists, and cardiologists.
- Statistical adjustments were made for patient demographics and disease severity.
Main Results:
- Cardiologists demonstrated substantially lower hospital costs and shorter lengths of stay compared to internists and hospitalists.
- These efficiency gains were particularly pronounced in diagnosis groups involving cardiovascular procedures.
- No statistically significant differences in mortality or 30-day readmission rates were observed among the physician groups.
Conclusions:
- Cardiologists may offer greater efficiency in managing specific cardiovascular diseases, particularly when procedures are required.
- The choice of attending physician can impact healthcare resource utilization without adversely affecting patient mortality or readmission rates.
- Findings suggest a potential benefit of utilizing cardiologists as attending physicians for improved efficiency in cardiovascular care.
Abstract:
Cardiologists may be the principal attending physician or the consultant to general internists or hospitalists in hospitalized patients with cardiovascular diseases. To find out which role may be best for quality and efficiency, a retrospective cohort study of 15, 113 patients in 11 cardiovascular diagnosis groups was carried out. Hospital cost, length of stay, mortality, and 30-day readmissions were compared among attending physicians who were hospitalists, general internists, or cardiologists. After adjustment for differences in demography and severity, cardiologists generally had substantially lower cost and length of stay compared with internists or hospitalists, especially when the diagnosis group included a cardiovascular procedure. Hospitalists and internists did not differ substantially in cost or length of stay. There were no statistically significant differences among the physician groups in mortality or 30-day readmissions. In conclusion, cardiologists may be the more efficient attending physician for selected cardiovascular diseases, especially when procedures are involved.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

