Oncological outcomes of nephron sparing nephrectomy. 17-year analysis

Alfredo Aguilera Bazan1, B Bañuelos, J M Alonso-Dorrego

  • 1Servicio de Urologia. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid .Spain.

Abstract

Insights

Nephron sparing surgery for small renal tumors (<4 cm) shows excellent oncological outcomes. Positive surgical margins did not significantly impact cancer-specific survival in this 17-year study.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Nephron sparing surgery is the standard for renal tumors <4 cm.
  • Evaluating long-term oncological outcomes is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the oncological results of nephron sparing renal surgery over 17 years.
  • To analyze recurrence and survival rates after nephron sparing surgery for small renal tumors.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 130 renal tumor surgeries (open and laparoscopic) from 1995-2012.
  • Evaluation of pathological results, surgical margins, local relapse, distant metastases, and mortality.
  • Mean follow-up of 71 months.

Main Results:

  • Clear cell carcinoma (73%) in pT1 stage (87%) were most common, with a mean tumor size of 3 cm.
  • Positive surgical margin rate was 7%, with no recurrence in these cases (37-month follow-up).
  • Cancer-specific mortality was 0% and local recurrence rate was 3%.

Conclusions:

  • Nephron sparing surgery offers oncological results comparable to radical nephrectomy for renal tumors <4 cm.
  • Positive surgical margins appear to have minimal impact on cancer-specific survival.