Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging
Published on: September 24, 2017
Internal or in-scan validation: a method to assess CBCT and MSCT gray scales using a human cadaver
Péter Bujtár1, János Simonovics2, Gergely Zombori3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals of Oulu; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
This study shows that cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) can quantify tissue density using the Hounsfield unit scale. An internal validation method helps correct for differences between CBCT and MSCT protocols.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Dental Imaging
Background:
- Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) are advanced imaging techniques.
- Quantifying tissue density is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
- The Hounsfield unit (HU) scale is a standard for measuring radiodensity in CT scans.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability of CBCT and MSCT for quantifying tissue density.
- To determine if the Hounsfield unit scale is applicable to CBCT imaging.
- To compare gray scale values between CBCT and MSCT in the mandible region.
Main Methods:
- A clinical MSCT scanner and CBCT were used to image a phantom with mandible region slices.
- Effective energy-adjusted photon beam attenuation references were employed.
- Gray values from both scanner datasets were compared using linear profile lines.
Main Results:
- A strong correlation was found between the gray values from CBCT and MSCT scans.
- Position-dependent differences were quantified, validating the imaging methods.
- The internal validation process demonstrated consistency between the two imaging modalities.
Conclusions:
- An internal, in-scan validation method can estimate and potentially compensate for protocol differences between MSCT and CBCT.
- This validation approach can guide users when expecting deviations in imaging protocols.
- CBCT shows potential for accurate tissue density quantification comparable to MSCT.

