Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses
Published on: September 19, 2011
Does the goal justify the methods? Harm and benefit in neuroscience research using animals
Ana Catarina Vieira de Castro1, I Anna S Olsson
1Laboratory Animal Science Group, IBMC-Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract:
The goal of the present chapter is to open up for discussion some of the major ethical issues involved in animal-based neuroscience research. We begin by approaching the question of the moral acceptability of the use of animals in research at all, exploring the implications of three different ethical theories: contractarianism, utilitarianism, and animal rights. In the rest of this chapter, we discuss more specific issues of neuroscience research within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm-benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.

