Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
An approach to addressing selection bias in survival analysis
Caroline S Carlin1, Craig A Solid
1Medica Research Institute, Minnetonka, MN, U.S.A.
This study introduces a new survival analysis model (esSurv) to address non-random treatment assignment, offering faster computation and clearer interpretation than existing methods. The model accurately estimates treatment effects, crucial for reliable results in survival data analysis.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Survival Analysis
- Health Economics
Background:
- Non-random treatment assignment is a common challenge in survival analysis, potentially biasing results.
- Existing methods like propensity scores or uncorrected models can yield biased estimates, even with large sample sizes.
- The two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) method addresses endogeneity but has computational and interpretive limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and validate a novel endogenous selection survival model (esSurv) that accounts for non-random treatment assignment.
- To demonstrate the computational and interpretive advantages of esSurv compared to 2SRI and other methods.
- To assess the impact of endogeneity on survival outcomes using real-world dialysis patient data.
Main Methods:
- Development of the endogenous selection survival model (esSurv) incorporating frailty.
- Monte Carlo simulations to compare esSurv performance against 2SRI, propensity score methods, and uncorrected models.
- Application of esSurv to dialysis patient data comparing mortality risk between mature arteriovenous grafts and those not yet ready for use.
Main Results:
- esSurv parameter estimates closely align with 2SRI results, indicating consistency.
- esSurv demonstrates significantly faster computation and generally smaller standard errors than 2SRI.
- esSurv explicitly estimates the correlation of unobservable factors (ρ=0.55), providing superior interpretability over 2SRI's residual parameter.
- Uncorrected models showed substantial bias (hazard ratio 0.630) compared to esSurv (0.197) and 2SRI (0.173).
Conclusions:
- The proposed esSurv model effectively handles non-random treatment assignment in survival analysis.
- esSurv offers significant computational and interpretive benefits over existing methods, including 2SRI.
- Accounting for endogeneity is critical for accurate survival outcome estimation, as demonstrated in the dialysis patient example.
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Censoring Survival Data

