Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

68.9K
Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA): messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three RNA types consist of a...
68.9K
RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

20.0K
20.0K
RNA Structure01:19

RNA Structure

6.5K
The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
6.5K
Determination of Crystal Structures01:29

Determination of Crystal Structures

135
In the late 1800s, the revelation that light extended beyond visible wavelengths led to the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen. Recognized as high-energy electromagnetic radiation with short wavelengths, X-rays prompted exploration into their interaction with crystals. Max von Laue proposed in 1912 that the periodic arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules in crystals would cause them to diffract X-rays, a hypothesis confirmed through experiments with copper sulfate and zinc sulfide...
135

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conformational changes of the baseplate regulating tail contraction of Staphylococcus phage 812.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same author

Mechanistic insights into the pore-scale transport and retention of microplastics: bridging physical and geochemical controls.

Water research·2026
Same author

A Wnt-induced conformational phospho-switch in DVL3 controls association with Frizzled receptors and Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Phosphorylation of SF3B1 by CDK11 orchestrates spliceosome activation via SNIP1-dependent RES complex recruitment.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

PRICKLE3 protects VANGL proteins from CK1-mediated phosphorylation and RNF43-mediated degradation.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Generalized Erythematous Plaques and Pustules in a Pregnant Patient.

Cutis·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
14:44

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR

Published on: December 16, 2013

9.3K

Robust and highly accurate automatic NOESY assignment and structure determination with Rosetta.

Zaiyong Zhang1, Justin Porter, Konstantinos Tripsianes

  • 1Department Chemie, Biomolecular NMR and Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstrasse 4, 85747, Garching, Germany.

Journal of Biomolecular NMR
|May 22, 2014
PubMed
Summary

A new autoNOE-Rosetta method automates nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) assignment and protein structure determination. This robust approach improves accuracy, especially for large proteins and challenging data, outperforming existing methods.

More Related Videos

Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
14:55

Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: September 17, 2017

16.8K
Structural Information from Single-molecule FRET Experiments Using the Fast Nano-positioning System
12:30

Structural Information from Single-molecule FRET Experiments Using the Fast Nano-positioning System

Published on: February 9, 2017

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
14:44

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR

Published on: December 16, 2013

9.3K
Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
14:55

Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: September 17, 2017

16.8K
Structural Information from Single-molecule FRET Experiments Using the Fast Nano-positioning System
12:30

Structural Information from Single-molecule FRET Experiments Using the Fast Nano-positioning System

Published on: February 9, 2017

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology
  • Computational chemistry
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is crucial for determining protein structures.
  • Automating Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE) assignment and structure determination remains a challenge.
  • Existing methods often struggle with incomplete or noisy experimental data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel, automated, and unsupervised method for simultaneous NOE assignment and protein structure determination.
  • To enhance the accuracy and robustness of NMR structure calculation.
  • To provide a reliable tool for structural biologists using NMR data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the autoNOE-Rosetta framework within CS-Rosetta.
  • Utilizing unassigned peak lists and chemical shift assignments as input.
  • Testing the method on 50 diverse protein targets (50-200 residues).
  • Comparison with existing software and PDB-deposited NMR models.

Main Results:

  • Significantly improved performance compared to established programs, especially for larger proteins and perdeuterated samples.
  • Generated unsupervised models often showed higher accuracy than expert-supervised PDB models.
  • Robust performance even with unrefined or partially incorrect input data.
  • Successfully generated correct models for a protein with an incorrect PDB structure.

Conclusions:

  • The autoNOE-Rosetta approach offers a robust and accurate solution for automated NOE assignment and structure determination.
  • This method advances NMR structure calculation by handling challenging datasets effectively.
  • It has the potential to streamline structural biology workflows and improve the quality of deposited NMR structures.