Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

2.3K
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
2.3K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.5K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.5K
Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

13.6K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
13.6K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

754
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
754
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

1.3K
In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tests of the abilities to judge ratios of extensive and intensive sensory magnitudes.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2019
Same author

The Cognitive and Perceptual Laws of the Inclined Plane.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same author

Judgments of differences and ratios of subjective heaviness.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2017
Same author

On the ability to directly evaluate sensory ratios.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2012
Same author

Grouping by achromatic color and surface segregation.

Psychological research·2011
Same author

On the bisection operation.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Test of the ratio judgment hypothesis.

Sergio Cesare Masin1

  • 1a University of Padua.

The Journal of General Psychology
|May 22, 2014
PubMed
Summary

People can judge sensory intensity ratios by responding to intensity differences. This finding holds true across different senses and response methods, impacting evaluation scale comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Psychophysics
  • Sensory Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • The ability to judge ratios of subjective intensities is a foundational concept in psychological research.
  • Previous studies suggest that individuals perceive sensory intensity differences during ratio judgment tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To rigorously verify and extend prior findings on sensory intensity ratio judgments.
  • To investigate the generalizability of these findings across different sensory modalities and response systems.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental verification of prior results.
  • Testing on sensory dimensions including brightness and heaviness.
  • Utilizing both verbal and matching response systems.
Keywords:
difference judgmentevaluation scalesratio judgment

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K

Main Results:

  • Experimental results strongly confirmed that participants respond to sensory intensity differences while performing ratio judgment tasks.
  • The observed phenomenon was consistent across different sensory inputs (brightness, heaviness).
  • The findings were replicated across distinct response modalities (verbal, matching).

Conclusions:

  • The study provides stringent verification that human perception of sensory intensity ratios is mediated by responses to intensity differences.
  • The generalizability across sensory dimensions and response systems suggests a fundamental aspect of sensory processing.
  • These findings have significant implications for interpreting and comparing scores derived from ratio judgment-based evaluation scales.